Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aquila48

So how does this efficiency compare to that of silicon based photovoltaics?


3 posted on 01/15/2017 11:24:07 PM PST by moonhawk (My Basket of Deplorable is Irredeemably mired in the Swamp of Crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: moonhawk; Secret Agent Man

“So how does this efficiency compare to that of silicon based photovoltaics?”

It can actually be additive... so together they get near 50% efficiency.

https://cleantechnica.com/2016/12/31/perovskite-layer-boost-solar-cell-efficiency-20/


4 posted on 01/15/2017 11:29:00 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: moonhawk

Per the article it is a few percentage points more efficient than the standard silicone panels. It sounds like the major breakthrough beyond a point or two of efficiency is costs and ease to produce.


6 posted on 01/15/2017 11:32:39 PM PST by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: moonhawk

20 to 27% for the silicon based cells. While these are a bit lower, if they really come out cheaper and can be placed on curved surfaces, it might make sense to be on more roofs. Solar still won’t replace baseload power.. I really hope Trump’s energy initiative puts money into Thorium.


31 posted on 01/16/2017 2:07:29 AM PST by digiphaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson