[Spunky]

I heard someone say there was no time stamps on the photo comparisons so Trumps could have been taken earlier then Obama’s.

[gunsequalfreedom]

The BBC had a time stamp that shows it at 11:20 a.m. Washington DC time. That is 25 minutes before Trump was sworn in.

[Let's Roll]

There's a time stamp on this tweet that they have been using to 'prove' how small Trump's crowd is.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3516243/posts

link above shows twitter posting that compares 2017 and 2009 - note time of twitter posting

(scroll down, it's in post #24) This is interactive version taken while Trump was actually speaking.

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/

[LaineyDee]

I was watching this on TV starting at about 6:30am CST on Fox and the pic being shown as Trump’s looks just like the one I saw at about 7:00am. The commentator was saying “It looks like the crowd is starting to gather and there are many mingling around as they search for a good spot”. Now I wish I had recorded it. The MSM is so dishonest.

[Thumper1960]

The original digital photos would have EXIF data encoded that would detail date and time, exposure parameters and in some cases the photographer’s name and GPS data.