Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAFTA: The Misnamed Treaty (1992)
The New American ^ | 28 December 1992 | Thomas R. Eddlem

Posted on 01/27/2017 10:30:13 AM PST by VitacoreVision

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
The North American "Free Trade" Agreement is 1,700 pages of unconstitutional government intervention. By Thomas R. Eddlem
1 posted on 01/27/2017 10:30:13 AM PST by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

Pretty much everything our government does is misnamed in true Orwellian fashion.


2 posted on 01/27/2017 10:32:51 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Although NAFTA is being promoted as a "free trade" agreement among the nations of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, it has much more to do with economic integration and eventual political merger than it does with what is termed genuine free trade.

Which is exactly what those of us who support free trade have always said about NAFTA. Free trade does not require an agreement. It is, by definition, unilateral.

3 posted on 01/27/2017 10:44:15 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

H. Ross Perot named it correctly; “A giant sucking sound.”


4 posted on 01/27/2017 10:53:48 AM PST by polymuser (There's a big basket of deportables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

When this POS treaty was being floated as an idea the fact that it would result in our factories being relocated to Mexico and our workers being sacrificed on the alter of globalism was never mentioned. Funny that.


5 posted on 01/27/2017 10:57:47 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

That’s what Ross Perot was saying.


6 posted on 01/27/2017 10:59:32 AM PST by stillfree? (Sooooo Deplorable, but more ireedeemable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

“The defeat of NAFTA would be the first step in precisely the wrong direction–an American looking inward rather than reason,” wails the New Republic.

False, Naiveté’s defeat would be a declaration of independence by a new generation of Americans, a shot heard ’round the world that the Old Republic is back, that we Americans are, once again, going to start looking out for America First.

If we don’t who will?
......................
By Patrick J. Buchanan November 1993

It’s Not About Free Trade — It’s About Our Way of Life…

“It may not be too great a flight of rhetoric to say that, at this crossroads of post-Cold War history, Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot represent the cause of evil.”

Thus did the New Republic close an editorial begun on its cover calling NAFTA “the most critical vote in years


7 posted on 01/27/2017 11:09:04 AM PST by ex-snook (The one true God sent Jesus here to show us the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

And the U.S. economy proceed to add jobs for more than a decade. So if you need to be wrong, make it spectacular.


8 posted on 01/27/2017 11:27:59 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va
When this POS treaty was being floated as an idea the fact that it would result in our factories being relocated to Mexico and our workers being sacrificed on the alter of globalism was never mentioned

Maybe because it's proponents mistakenly believed that protectionists know how free(r) markets operate?

9 posted on 01/27/2017 11:29:54 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
From Hertiage, a big supporter of NAFTA back in the day.

The North American Free Trade Agreement: Ronald Reagan's Vision Realized

'...The NAFTA also will offer Americans cheaper goods, and increase U.S. exports by making them more affordable for the rest of the world. Moreover, it will create an estimated 200,000 new jobs for Americans, reduce illegal immigration from Mexico, help tackle drug trafficking, strengthen Mexican democracy and human rights, and serve as a model for the rest of the world.'



10 posted on 01/27/2017 11:50:00 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Yep! RP was prescient...


11 posted on 01/27/2017 12:28:42 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Maybe Heritage was thinking about all of those high-paying jobs we would send to Mexico? Who would have guess that Ross Perot and Heritage actually were on the same page?


12 posted on 01/27/2017 12:43:52 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

“... but there are an additional 348 pages of annexes...”

I think these annexes are what dispossessed the poorest farmers from their lands to enrich the oligarchs, prompting the massive illegal invasion of America from Mexico.


13 posted on 01/27/2017 12:55:50 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision

I remember Rush Limbaugh eulogizing NAFTA, and denouncing people like me who opposed it.

I have never trusted that Neocon Bushite since then.


14 posted on 01/27/2017 12:58:25 PM PST by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

How do you feel about Ronald Reagan, then? NAFTA was his idea.


15 posted on 01/27/2017 1:03:16 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: YogicCowboy

Free Republic remembers:

Rush Limbaugh TV Show 1993-pro NAFTA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3425200/posts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycgYMFZd_Cw


16 posted on 01/27/2017 1:21:01 PM PST by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
The idea of NAFTA and the actual document are two separate things. I really don't blame Reagan, I blame the CFR and the Heritage Foundation.
Long-Standing Support for Free Trade with Mexico. Ronald Reagan first proposed a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Mexico in his 1980 presidential campaign. Since that time, The Heritage Foundation is proud of the role it has played in articulating President Reagan's vision of free trade in Latin America and around the world.
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1993/11/em371-the-north-american-free-trade-agreement
17 posted on 01/27/2017 1:26:13 PM PST by VitacoreVision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
Rush Limbaugh TV Show 1993-pro NAFTA

...........

Sure did - Rush mocked Perot. Very few heard the 'sucking sound' of NAFTA like Perot and Buchanan both of whom were smeared. [remind you of anyone today who recently ran for office and also heard the sucking sound!!]

18 posted on 01/27/2017 1:42:28 PM PST by ex-snook (The one true God sent Jesus here to show us the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: VitacoreVision
The idea of NAFTA and the actual document are two separate things.

Saying it is one thing. Proving it is another. The only way I could see that happening is if someone compared the texts of the original FTA with Canada, and NAFTA itself.

If any significant differences are found, then one could argue that Reagan might not have approved of the latter. If none are found, then one can infer that Reagan approved.

I have yet to see anybody establish the former.

19 posted on 01/27/2017 1:50:20 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Yup. It only took just over a decade and a large recession to “prove” Perot correct. Or so his supporters believe.


20 posted on 01/27/2017 1:52:17 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson