A Point For Consideration, A Typical Liberal
Posted on 01/30/2017 8:56:17 AM PST by ColdOne
The only really good news here is that Fineswine is going on 84, so she’s a candidate for a dirt nap sooner rather than later. Just too bad Schumer isn’t as old as she is. They are both reprehensible people.
A Point For Consideration, A Typical Liberal
Yeah. Where was she when Obama was doing unconstitutional DACA and DAPA?
They have a lot more stones than the Repubs do. Gotta give em that.
Obviously DiFi is going senile. Republican outnumber Dim in Senate and her crap doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell of going anywhere.
Why are the taxpayers waisting money on the salaries of such Azzhole?
“Why do these Clymers have such a hard-on to bring Syrians to small town America?”
A psychiatric male nurse told me about a woman in his therapy group in a major mental hospital who believed she was Queen Victoria. (This despite zero knowledge about the queen and her era.) He gently chided, Emily, no, you’re not. She balled her fist and swung it across his face sending this large man for a complete loop. She posed one hand on hip and wagged a finger at him, “You don’t contradict me.”
When you question the unreal world of crazy people you get an instant defensive response. That response is intended to punish you for your contradiction. Many of the liberals I’ve met over the years are some version of crazy. They may be so far gone like Emily that they can’t live in the real world at all, or they may be fully functional except for their hot button issues. You will recognize how crazy they are by how out-of-proportion their response is to your views.
“They get upset more when someone tries to protect us....”
Actually, they get upset when their fellow revolutionaries are denied free access and movement in the United States.
IMHO
The anti-American leftist liberals are actively and openly pushing criminal and, in some cases, downright treasonous activity. It is time to start treating them likewise. Or, we should shut the hell up and accept our chains. It’s one or the other. Can’t have it both ways.
Yesterday, the mayor of Austin, TX slipped up and admitted nearly 1 in 4 Austinites weren’t born in the US. The Terrorist in Chief sent 600 Syrians (no telling how many thousands from other ME countries) to Austin last year and the mayor is all jiggy about getting more this year. Austin, the Berkeley of the South. Just keeping Austin weird.
Was Di fine with BJ and Omuzzy doing the exact same bans? Then what’s her problem other than Trump did it.
CA calls her “DiFi”, and she is an icon there.
Who REALLY wrote this bill? Feinstein is as dumb as a damn rock...which one of the Soros foundations/’think tanks’ really wrote this bill? Hmmm..?
The Senate can initiate legislation. It is appropriation bills that must originate in the House.
NOT in 3/4 of the state.
Perhaps there/s the prospect of empaneled FBI agents with Grand Jury subpoena power investigating things like how her husband/s investment group managed to obtain several Billion dollars taxpayer-funded govt contracts .....
BACKSTORY: Back in Sept 2014, Senate intel head Di/Fi was whining about the CIA looking through her computers and taking documents. Clearly, the CIA had plenty on her----even BEFORE the shocking Chi/Com missile scandal brke involving a Cali state Senator.
Di/Fi's known aversion to guns did not prevent her from honoring Sen Leland Lee's co-defendant, Raymond Chow---Chow is the key figure in Cali's Demorat state Sen Yee's shocking sub rosa missile deal w/ China (Yee is a notorious grabber of American guns).
INCONVENIENT FACTOIDS:
<><>Feinstein heads the Senate Intel Committee;
<><> Her hubby Richard Blum made million as the lawyer for Chinese interests and from tax-funded govt contracts;
<><> Did Di use her access to valuable US security data improperly?
<><> Hubby Richard Blum made millions in China deals in past years. How'd he do that?
<><> Is hubby cutting new deals w/ the Chi/Coms?
ITEM--Senator’s husband profits for 15 years from federal funds (Feinstein-Blum)
NY Post | 1/19/15 | Richard Johnson / FR Posted by Libloather
My report Sunday on the lucrative deal Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s husband has to sell 56 post office buildings barely scratched the surface of her conflicts of interest. The California Democrat’s financier husband, Richard C. Blum, is estimated to be a billionaire from his shrewd investments in companies that profit from federal policies.
“For at least 15 years, Feinstein has appeared to support government contracts that push federal funds toward companies co-owned or governed by her powerful, billionaire husband, Richard C. Blum,” Breitbart News reported. (Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
=====================================================
ITEM--Sen Finestein's husband, Richard Blum, became a billionaire representing China's interests.
BACKSTORY: Back in Sept 2014, Senate intel head Di/Fi was whining about the CIA looking through her computers and taking documents. Clearly, the CIA had plenty on her.
====================================================
Sponsored by Senator Diane Feinstein, the Desert Wilderness Protection Act and its companion bill known as the California Desert Protection Act created three new national parks and seventy- four new wilderness areas in the desert of California that total 8 million acres (an area the size of Maryland).
This closes acreage to development, forces out private owners within the protected area and closes mines and ranches. It also expands the Death Valley and Joshua Tree national monuments and upgrades them to national parks.
It seems that the real motivation for passage of this bill lies with the special interest groups that would benefit monetarily. Through a complex series of land exchanges, Catellus Corporation (Owned by none other than Richard Blum DiFI Hubby), a subsidiary of Santa Fe Pacific, will receive land that contains some of the richest gold deposits in the world.
<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government (involves several felonies and could include forgery);
<><> 18 U.S.C.§1027 False statements and concealment of facts in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and other possible offenses including civiland/or criminal RICO violations.
<><> 18 U.S.C. §§1961-68 (RICO Act)18 U.S.C. §1001 (making false Statements to Agents of the US Government),
<><> 18 U.S.C. §241(Conspiracies Against Civil Rights).
<><> Possibly full investigations crentering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c) could be warranted because (1) the persons (2) were employed by or associated with an enterprise (3) that engaged in or affected interstate commerce and that (4) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (5) through a "pattern" (6) of racketeering activity, and (7) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the "pattern" of racketeering activity.
<><> Alleged Offenses could include Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §241 – Conspiracy Against Constitutional Rights – which prohibits in relevant part, “two or more persons (from conspiring) to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . .” See, 18 U.S.C. §241.
Taxpayers demand the following agencies commence investigtions at once:
<><> FBI -- Wire Fraud Division
<><> IRS-Fraud Unit
<><> Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General,
<><> Department of Commerce’s Office of Inspector General.
<><> DOJ's Criminal Division-- Public Integrity Section
<><> DOJ Criminal Division--Organized Crime and Gang Section.
FBI TIP PAGE https://tips.fbi.gov
ML/NJ
To Sen. Feinstein: Sit down,shut up & listen. You may accidentally learn something that way.
Nope and nope, cubed. It won't pass either house and it wouldn't withstand a court appeal. The President has plenary powers when it comes to immigration. "But my crazy constituents don't like it!" is not quite good enough.
“I’m old enough to remember when it was the *House* that initiated legislation.”
That was for budget legislation.
Showboating for their shrinking base is all Democrat leaders have left.
What we are seeing is the death throes of liberalism as a political force in America, for the time being. (Commies never quit.)
If Trump can help improve our economic well-being and appoint a couple of good judges to SCOTUS, things will be looking pretty good for a while.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
