Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Use Senate rules to break Supreme Court filibuster
The Washington Times ^ | January 30, 2017 | James I. Wallner

Posted on 01/31/2017 10:37:47 PM PST by TBP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: seastay
"if the Democrats ever get back in power they will use it anyhow first chance they get."

They'll do it, anyway. Once again, the Pubbies are boxing using Queensbury rules, and the 'Rats are eating our lunch using guerilla tactics. Man up, McConnell. Nuke the SOBs.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

21 posted on 02/01/2017 1:35:51 AM PST by wku man (Just One Gun, the latest from 10 Pound Test - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6uFqQenIU4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Two filibuster speeches apiece for 40+ Democrat senators? That could go for weeks!


22 posted on 02/01/2017 1:40:06 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

The GOP never stops a Democrat SC nominee when the Dems are in power anyway, so I see no reason to not let it become the “new normal” to blast it through with the slim majority.


23 posted on 02/01/2017 1:41:46 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Dems will always get their flawed supreme court Nominees. Some republicans will always, error on the side of being fair while Dems never will.

Since Dems are the only ones who fillibuster Supreme court Nominees, I say go with the nuclear option.

With the nuclear option, Dems won’t gain anything with a dem president, and republicans will get a constitutional judge with a GOP president!

Bring on the Nuclear option, we conservatives have nothing to lose!


24 posted on 02/01/2017 1:44:45 AM PST by teppe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seastay

The only reason the rats never used the nuclear option for the SC is because it was never necessary. They could always find enough RINOs to agree to vote for any leftist activist radical they cared to nominate. Should Republicans ever attain conservative unity the rats would go nuclear in a heartbeat.


25 posted on 02/01/2017 1:55:36 AM PST by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Flake is up for re-election in 2018, for the next 2 years, he has to be a good RINO.


26 posted on 02/01/2017 2:09:04 AM PST by The_Republic_Of_Maine (politicians beware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The Dems should just convene now and decide which eight Rats Senators are going to vote for Gorsuch. The 2018 election will be here quick.


27 posted on 02/01/2017 2:12:37 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

Thank you for posting the actual stats. We could make 2018 another good year. The Dems are doing their part to get Republicans elected.


28 posted on 02/01/2017 2:21:03 AM PST by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TBP
In living memory the Senate had no "cloture" as was acted out in Frank Capra's Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, to filibuster was without remedy. That's part of the dirty and not-so-little secret many a sitting Senator may not even be aware of any longer.

The Filibuster is not in the Constitution, the need to "have 60 votes" to pass something through the U.S. Senate is never the real issue. They need 60 votes to end a potential filibuster, something exhaustion could accomplish in due course anyway.

No, the "filibuster" and its terminator "cloture" are not in the Constitution, to be sure, though the U.S. Senate certainly is, as is both Houses of Congress' right to setting its own Rules.

The only issue, unless like so many of our newsreaders one is hopelessly lost in the subterranean maze under Washington, DC is only among the Senate Rules, which can be changed either permanently - as when "cloture" was added to those Rules (by a Democrat-controlled Senate fifty years ago) - or even suspended temporarily, or for a specific purpose or group of purposes.

The Republican majority can't escape it's responsibility as the Majority, even if the Hydrogen bomb solution hidden under "going nuclear" above results in the Body of the States becoming a more democratically responsive assembly.

The smell of ass doth lie heavily upon the Chamber. Getting a presidential nominee confirmed should not require the kind of super majority needed to confirm treaties and amend the Constitution.

End the filibuster, by enduring a filibuster if necessary, and this ridiculousness is ended.

29 posted on 02/01/2017 2:22:05 AM PST by Prospero (Lex est rex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

Democrat numbers in the Senate need to be driven down into the 30’s...permanently.


30 posted on 02/01/2017 2:25:01 AM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

“We could make 2018 another good year. “

And because we have a relatively small number of Senate seats to “defend,” we should avail ourselves of the opportunity to RIF a few who are not worthy of retaining. In my view these people should be turned out:
Orrin Hatch (who will be 84 and will have “served” for 44 years in the Senate), Bob Corker, Dean Heller, Jeff Flake ( aptly named), and Ted Cruz (unless he somehow manages to redeem himself).


31 posted on 02/01/2017 2:30:26 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TBP

162 days is too long


32 posted on 02/01/2017 2:33:36 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
This is what led to the earlier gang of 8

. That was then, this is now, after Reid used the N.O. Also the Pubs number one issue to force people to the polls for the last 10 years has been getting good SCOTUS justices. That's why McConnell had to find enough backbone to hold the seat open. They have to deliver, there's no more excuses.

33 posted on 02/01/2017 3:09:10 AM PST by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seastay
Nuke option now and later.., if the Democrats ever get back in power they will use it anyhow first chance they get.

Absolut-ely correct.


34 posted on 02/01/2017 3:42:37 AM PST by USS Alaska (Kill all mooselimb, terrorist savages, with extreme prejudice! Deus Vult!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RockyTx

“Republicans could
‘flash mob’ the floor of the Senate
at three in the morning”

They should “leak” that is what they are going to do. Then have one high visibility Senator make a move to go. They would all have to get up and run to the Senate Chambers just to see the Senator out for a morning jog. Followed by CNN, ABC, NBC, etc.

A few nights of that would be GOLD!


35 posted on 02/01/2017 3:58:04 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I predict that they will draw out the questioning but he will be easily confirmed by a large majority.

Scummee is coming off like a jerk...

The man was approved unanimously for his present judgeship.

36 posted on 02/01/2017 4:01:21 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Agree. Schumer is weak, panicked and not a fighter.

He is a cryer.


37 posted on 02/01/2017 4:14:34 AM PST by Redleg Duke (He is leading us in Making America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Anyone who underestimates Trump has been left bitterly disappointed. He has insulted McCain, Graham, and Rubio loudly and often. He is just setting them up for a trip to the woodshed. He will lay the lumber to them if McConnell can't get the job done.

Collins will fall to his charming side. If that fails he will detail the job to Melania.

He has so much ammunition piled up, he will never run out, and he's not afraid to use it.

Look forward to eight years of winning.

38 posted on 02/01/2017 4:15:47 AM PST by Former Proud Canadian (My North America stops at the Rio Grande)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Perhaps each one could speak longer, but I doubt it. Based on Pat Leahy’s sad performance today just speaking for 15 minutes, I doubt he could last an hour on the floor
**************
The average rat senator is in their mid 70’s ,, it’d be quick.


39 posted on 02/01/2017 4:41:26 AM PST by Neidermeyer (Bill Clinton is a 5 star general in the WAR ON WOMEN and Hillary is his Goebbels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer

That is the Rat problem. If forced to actually filibuster, the will be unable to sustain the effort and will lose.

The first to collapse will end the effort in a loss. As his corpse is dragged from the Senate well, the bill can be passed.


40 posted on 02/01/2017 4:44:12 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson