Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump must break judicial power
Worldnet Daily ^ | February 9th, 2017 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 02/09/2017 6:39:29 PM PST by Mariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: montag813

Trump’s m0ommy and daddy didn’t raise no stupid son...just wait, watch and learn.


61 posted on 02/09/2017 9:35:29 PM PST by Postman (The Flies have finished defining BHO and HRC and will be moving on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Runner4life

unlike John Kerry who................... served in Vietnam


62 posted on 02/09/2017 9:37:54 PM PST by Postman (The Flies have finished defining BHO and HRC and will be moving on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

You’re welcome. Oh and one more from Katrina the Kommie urging collectivists in CONgre$$...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/its-time-for-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-to-raise-its-game/2017/02/07/d5d9a03e-ed5f-11e6-9662-6eedf1627882_story.html?utm_term=.661e640716c3


63 posted on 02/09/2017 9:39:33 PM PST by PGalt (HOORAY President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Postman

also....remember that revenge is a dish best served cold


64 posted on 02/09/2017 9:40:59 PM PST by Postman (The Flies have finished defining BHO and HRC and will be moving on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Saying “If terrorism occurs, it’s on THEM,” is no consolation and certainly no settlement.
Work-arounds are surrender.
Accepting the court’s decision is accepting the court’s supremacy over the Executive.
And this time the victim isn’t one Terri Schiavo.
This has to be confronted head on.
The overreach, the usurpation by the Judiciary cannot be allowed to stand, must not be respected or even “ignored.”
It must be defeated utterly.


65 posted on 02/09/2017 9:44:39 PM PST by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Oh yuck; I see that vanden HOVEL ( misspelled on purpose ) is still waving the blood red flag. I don’t know why, but I happily thought that she was dead. Too bad I wasn’y correct in that assumption.


66 posted on 02/09/2017 9:46:56 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

Congress needs to find its gonads. BO put them in a lock box.


67 posted on 02/09/2017 10:05:07 PM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

the libs are going try to use jiudcial power to block EVERYTHING Turmp does from here on out.

That cannot happen.

one crummy little judge should not be able to wipe out the power of a president. that is not a check and balance, that is judicial supremacy.


68 posted on 02/09/2017 11:04:49 PM PST by Cubs Fan (Modern day liberals are the most intolerant, hateful, and violent people in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

He’s taken a sledgehammer to Political Correctness.

He’s taken a sledgehammer to the corrupt media.

He’s taken a sledgehammer to the establishment.

He now has to take a sledgehammer to the out of control, totally politicized courts if the country is to be saved.

People say that if he defies the courts he’ll cause a constitutional crisis. HELL, WE ALREADY HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS WITH THE COURTS AS IS. By challenging them we’ll stop the pretense of the “independent judiciary”. It’ll bring the problem to the front burner and force the country to deal with it.

Challenging the courts and fixing this rotten system where a handful of unelected people can overturn decision by elected officials and even elections themselves would be Trump’s greatest achievement.

He should do it and challenge the Rats to stop him.

That is exactly how Obama operated. He did as he pleased and then told the republicans “Go ahead, stop me”.


69 posted on 02/10/2017 1:34:30 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross; taterjay; weeweed; Professional; kabar; Jim Robinson
Note: I pinged you six, because you're among the few I've seen so far who have accurately identified what is actually occurring. I know there are others, so perhaps they might respond as well to this continuing (or subsequent) thread.

Summary - Judicial overreach & review are just a feint, a tactical play being put into action to encourage Trump to either act hastily and/or over commit without proper appreciation of the forces who are arrayed against him and the American people).

As we all know, the courts have absolutely no power in which to enforce their un-Constitutional edict ... except via an impeachment threat from Congress. So, rather than continue to state the rather obvious ie the judiciary doesn't have standing, etc, we should ignore that particular issue for now and focus on who is really the controlling authority.

(As an aside, we should duly note that the current injunction is merely a 'defensive' move that *prevents* the execution of a positive EO. Realistically, it should only be a matter of days/weeks before the other shoe drops: another fed district court will rule on an affirmative action. That is, Trump will be *compelled* to positively perform in a directed manner similar to Xian bakers being forced to service customers not of their choosing.)

OK, so once we've identified who the real power is behind the pipsqueaks in robes, we might wish to take a collective breath of surprise at the unveiling of the horrible truth. Much like confronting a criminal ring while wondering exactly who has been providing unerring protection, discovering that the corruption rises to the very upper echelons of power should make sensible people pause to consider what we're actually facing and how serious this problem really is.

At this point, I don't believe Trump actually has to be in contempt of any court interpretation. Realistically, any tenuous charge can be trumped up in order to initiate impeachment action against him. So one must question whether or not he has sufficient time over the next 1-1.5 years on the campaign trail in which to attempt to alter electoral dynamics in the House.

Since Congress knows Trump has limited time before they lower the boom, the question is: (a) does he recognize & realize the true nature of (t)his peril; and (b) how does he respond? With respect to (b), what are his various alternatives that (temporarily?) place him in an advantageous position? Well, the most obvious is a national security emergency.

That's my conclusion - a national security emergency (real or false) gives Trump the necessary momentum & initiative to quickly employ domestic/foreign security forces to address both the primary attackers and internal, shadow powers. His 3 biggest weapons by far are charges of espionage, treason & sedition that would immediately alter the dynamics of the opposition.

The globalist uni-party, through its agents in Congress, the judiciary, media, et al have openly declared their intentions; it's now right out in the open. In many respects it's sort of sad to have to reach these conclusions as to our true state of affairs. On the other hand, we didn't ask for the fight - there's been a lot of denial as to what has actually been occurring, but the first step is recognizing what is really happening. For instance, the recent outrage over the court's usurpation is evidence that a sizable number are still incorrectly framing the threat.

The opposition has to understand the serious nature of the cascade of events they've begun. I believe they fully know what they've started and are waiting for Trump's response. If it's a ridiculous stream of twitter complaints, then we are either (a) screwed; or (b) ready to rock n' roll if they are a feint in themselves to mask the coming decapitation strike.

70 posted on 02/10/2017 2:52:57 AM PST by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

That would not be Rush, that would be me catching only parts of the show.. Not rushes fault.

as to the not denying it. that is a problem.


71 posted on 02/10/2017 5:56:07 AM PST by cableguymn (We need a redneck in the white house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: semantic

Well stated post. In essence, we are playing for all the marbles.


72 posted on 02/10/2017 5:57:09 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Trump needs to let it be known loud and clear that if this ruling gets an American citizen injured or killed he will ask congress to impeach the judges and hold them responsible.

He also needs to break the silence on the tyranny of the judiciary and start talking about impeachment and remind Congress they have a duty to protect American citizens and to assure there is a separation of power and the judiciary HAS clearly usurped the legislative branches power and cite several decisions, gay marriage, Roe, etc... and then declare now they are determined to usurp power from the executive branch and this will be stopped either with your help or without and if I have to do it without your help I will be asking the American people to contact you and let you know how much they appreciate your lack of concern for their safety and hold you accountable in the coming elections.

Trump also needs to reign in the budget for these federal judges and make their lives a living hell. If necessary put their offices in the public restrooms. Playing defense with these old tyrants in black robes won’t work, attack!


73 posted on 02/10/2017 11:22:08 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Professional

I think that the exercise of the appointment check is Trumps but the exercise of the scope or purview check is held by Congress. If the Republican Congress wants to let courts function like this they should do nothing. If they don’t the options are clear.


74 posted on 02/10/2017 11:25:30 AM PST by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: montag813
FALSE! There is a Wash Times report tonight that the traitors at DoS are massively increasing refugee admittances from Syria and Iraq -- are above levels when Obama was president.

I would expect Secretary of State Tillerson to fire them immediately, and recommend prosecution for anything they can be discovered to have done which violates the law.

75 posted on 02/10/2017 3:54:16 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

bkmk


76 posted on 02/11/2017 10:59:13 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44 (If you ain't the lead dog, the scenery never changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson