Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Neil Gorsuch: The President's Home Run for the Supreme Court
American Thinker ^ | February 10, 2017 | Ken Blackwell

Posted on 02/10/2017 3:34:32 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last
To: greeneyes
LOL...it's late (lousy excuse), you're getting more and more hysterical as the night goes by, and all because I pointed out some few simple facts about you idol. Bless your heart.

You did say, did you not, that just as you are allowed to have an opinion, so am I;however, since mine disagrees with yours, it has become a massive bone of contention for you.

Here's a very simple question for you : WHY DOESN'T IT BOTHER YOU THAT NAPOLITANO IS A LIBERTARIAN?

81 posted on 02/10/2017 11:06:11 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

It doesn’t bother me that he is a libertarian at all, as long as he is not a flaming liberal or liberal lite like Kennedy. Apparently that’s an issue for you. It’s not for me.

From the git go your posts have been rude, arrogant, and emotional. Obviously you have nothing of substance to offer, as you don’t even know that you are the one that used the word radar.

Your opinion is of no more value to me than wild eyed Nancy Pelosi’s opinion.


82 posted on 02/10/2017 11:18:20 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
For someone who claimed that they were done, several posts back, it appears that that was a lie.

Are you a Libertarian?

If not, do you really know what that's all about?

You are such an emotional person, are you sure you want to continue with this? Your emotions have blinded you to certain rather salient facts...such as age, political inclination, and past rulings.

Please do find and point out the substance in all of your past posts to me, regarding Judge Napolitano's qualifications, sans the emotional opinion you have of him.

It would help your case, if you would stop impugning me, whilst at the same time, showing all of the insults, heaped upon me, exhibited by yourself.

83 posted on 02/10/2017 11:31:57 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

LOL. Rave on fool.


84 posted on 02/10/2017 11:44:13 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

What an interesting post; care to make a few more, to expiate your previously made irrational insults and persiflage?


85 posted on 02/10/2017 11:52:52 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

LOL. I’ll be happy to quit when you do.


86 posted on 02/10/2017 11:59:38 PM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
It's such a shame that you either are incapable of standing your ground and replying to what was put to you.

Where is the substance ?

87 posted on 02/11/2017 12:12:33 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

LOL. I told you in the very first post that I really didn’t want to hear any more from you. Yet you keep on posting to me. You posts are arrogant and rude, so I have no intention of doing anything other than point out your rudeness and hysterical accusations.

Whatever point you might want to make is entirely lost in your obtuse rudeness. If I thought your opinion was worth 2 cents I might reply to whatever you seem to think I should. But to me your opinion sunk below zero when you got so rude.

So that’s it. You are rude. So just keep on replying and I’ll keep on telling you that you are rude, but I have no intention of seriously considering anything you have to say.


88 posted on 02/11/2017 12:33:50 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
Oh what a shame to abuse the English language so, when there are so many beautiful words to be chose from; instead, with a dearth of vocabulary, you are forced to repeat just one inapplicable one.

You could have just stopped posting to me, you know. *snicker*

89 posted on 02/11/2017 12:44:41 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Right back at you - snickering fool. LOL


90 posted on 02/11/2017 12:51:39 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
I suppose that that is want passes as scintillating repartee, in your circle.

Please allow me to disabuse you of such an erroneous assumption.

91 posted on 02/11/2017 12:56:42 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Whatever you say snickering fool.


92 posted on 02/11/2017 2:17:46 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson