>
Demands It Be Protected From Itself…, Gargantua wrote:
They are appointed to serve for life “during good behavior.”
What The F%*k is “good behavior” about an 80% overturned rate? Those three venal scumbags should be disbarred, disrobed, and sphinc-raped in public for what they’ve done.
>
I wouldn’t even coach it in ‘the overturn rate of X%’ (an alternate fact as it may be).
You want to cite chapter and verse of the Constitution, followed by precedent, you make your case (pun intended); that *is* their job. But, it should be hammered home that the panel did not rule on the LAW (no mention, no reference, not even a side-ways glance), but ENTIRELY upon F-E-E-L-I-N-G-S and the prejudice of the their own political bent.
IMO, that breeches ‘good behavior’. They wish to be law MAKERS, they won’t\shouldn’t (technically, CANNOT) be doing so from the bench. Congress and the States should be doing more in this area than they have since the Courts self-endowment of ‘final arbiter’ status.
Those three venal scumbags should be disbarred, disrobed, and sphinc-raped in public for what they’ve done.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lmao! That’s the funniest statement I’ve seen on FR in months! Sphinc-raped? Hilarious!