Ping...
I think this Stephen Miller is one of the smartest people around...
And, unlike Bush and the RINOs in the Congress, Trump will fight until the proper resolution is effected.
I keep looking in my Constitution for where it says, “And the judiciary branch is in charge of everybody and makes all final decisions.”
I keep looking but can’t find it.
If the President doesn’t acknowledge the order, power was not taken away.
Miller does not agree with Marbury vs Madison.
A point of stare decesis the courts will NEVER overturn.
I like Miller and I watched the morning shows. Miller is direct on message perfectly. We have so many winners in this administration and the left is going nuts. ;)
It comes down to this: The president doesn’t have power but only if all federal judges agree.
Anyone can find a federal judge to order anything.
The president is not subjected to judicial oversight.
Enforce the law.
If the court disagrees, ignore them and have them try to enforce their decision.
If the courts want to force a constitutional crisis, they’re playing with a losing hand.
Unelected judges have no business making political decisions.
What the judges did is take power away.
Number one reason never to elect a democrat president.
That just can't be - the courts always give us liberal/progs what we want even if we lose an election.
Stephen Miller’s thoughts - his ideas are so strong and right... they can stand on their own. Stridency doesn’t work for Stephen Miller... this is for him:
http://www.leonardcohenforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=20935
“Take the word butterfly. To use this word it is not necessary to make the voice weigh less than an ounce or equip it with small dusty wings. It is not necessary to invent a sunny day or a field of daffodils. It is not necessary to be in love, or to be in love with butterflies. The word butterfly is not a real butterfly. There is the word and there is the butterfly. If you confuse these two items people have the right to laugh at you. Do not make so much of the word. Are you trying to suggest that you love butterflies more perfectly than anyone else, or really understand their nature? The word butterfly is merely data. It is not an opportunity for you to hover, soar, befriend flowers, symbolize beauty and frailty, or in any way impersonate a butterfly. Do not act out words. Never act out words. Never try to leave the floor when you talk about flying. Never close your eyes and jerk your head to one side when you talk about death.”
“The poem is not a slogan. It cannot advertise you. It cannot promote your reputation for sensitivity. You are not a stud. You are not a killer lady. All this junk about the gangsters of love. You are students of discipline. Do not act out the words. The words die when you act them out, they wither, and we are left with nothing but your ambition.”
“The poem is nothing but information. It is the Constitution of the inner country. If you declaim it and blow it up with noble intentions then you are no better than the politicians whom you despise. You are just someone waving a flag and making the cheapest kind of appeal to a kind of emotional patriotism. Think of the words as science, not as art. They are a report. You are speaking before a meeting of the Explorers’ Club of the National Geographic Society. These people know all the risks of mountain climbing. They honour you by taking this for granted. If you rub their faces in it that is an insult to their hospitality. Tell them about the height of the mountain, the equipment you used, be specific about the surfaces and the time it took to scale it. Do not work the audience for gasps and sighs. If you are worthy of gasps and sighs it will not be from your appreciation of the event but from theirs. It will be in the statistics and not the trembling of the voice or the cutting of the air with your hands. It will be in the data and the quiet organization of your presence.”
The whole left side of the political spectrum is committed to judicial supremacy in most cases because it is easier to get their policies legislated by a couple of judges or justices, than it is to get them through a legislature, and with a Decision they can claim, and often succeed in putting over, that it is a Law of God and cannot be repealed, overturned, or lessened. In the cases of judges appointed by Republicans, on balance the left wins there, too, because Republicans insist on balancing their appointments so the leftists won’t feel bad and a certain large percentage of apparent conservatives have a habit of “growing” while on the bench and not subject to voters or bosses any more. The temptation for a judge to wave a wand to “correct” a perceived bad situation without having to wait for a legislature that might not even do it is pretty overwhelming. It is also much cheaper to bribe a couple of judges than to have to bribe a couple of dozen legislators. Same goes for blackmail and flat out extortion.
He is right but for the wrong reason. The branches of government are NOT equal.
Why do people say the branches are equal, anyway?
Where does it say the branches are co-equal? Nowhere.
Do not confuse checks and balances for co-equal branches.
The judicial branch is the weakest. The legislative branch is the strongest. The executive branch answers to the legislative and not the other way around. How do we know that? The legislative branch can remove the president or any executive branch official from office. The president cannot remove a congressman or senator. Nor can a president repeal a law and is required to execute the laws faithfully by the constitution.
The legislature can remove a judge from office. A judge cannot remove a congressman or senator. And so on.
The judicial branch only has power over the parties properly before it under the law and rules. No more.
There certainly is NOT any judicial supremacy in this country.
The judges did not take power away. The president relinquished it when they cooperated with the first case. They should have declared then that the courts had no jurisdiction and enforced the order. Everything since has been an acquiescence to the judiciary.