Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalHope
That is the reason I found the small scale flow tests from the design phase so interesting and concerning at the same time. Trying to narrow the flow after the water is released is just poor fluid(s) reality and against common physics principles. If any thing the spillway should get wider. AND who the heck decided to put the drop off in the spillway. It should of been a straight line from the gates to the bottom. Probably was chosen to save moving some additional earth. Well they wound up moving it anyway along with 900,000 additional yards at 100+ times what it would of cost in 1967.
2,712 posted on 03/27/2017 1:33:32 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ ("Try is the first step to failure." Homer Simpson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2710 | View Replies ]


To: mad_as_he$$

The dissipation blocks and the little flip at the end are meant to be energy dissipation features to try and impact the river less. There are even dams with a giant flip ski jumping spllway.

The dam height here means the spillway has to be long and energy generated is huge.


2,713 posted on 03/27/2017 3:02:08 PM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2712 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson