[pepsi_junkie]

The context was whether the travel EO was legal and he said something to the effect of “the powers of the president to protect our national security are substantial and will not be questioned” I think meaning that the court will not dispute them. “not be questioned” is not a good phrase but the video is dishonest to make it sound like he’s saying “ve vill issue you orders, orders that must be obeyed vithout qvestion!”

[zeestephen]

Thanks for the update, Pepsi.

That definitely adds some meaningful - and exculpatory - context.

[Elsie]

I think meaning that the court will not dispute them.

I'd think a court, a judge, who used to be a LAWYER; would actually LOOK UP any pertinent laws before running their mouth that they ain't constitutional!