Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ozark Tom

Perhaps this is the origin of the anecdote about a valve failure. It describes lots of neglect in certain parts of the dam. A mishap during equipment testing of 72 inch valves in 2009 is described as generating a near vacuum; and, generated a 100 mph wind flow deep within the dam. A five man crew narrowly escaped being sucked into the flow when a neglected steel safety bulkhead collapsed.

http://www.chicoer.com/article/zz/20100223/NEWS/100227917


58 posted on 02/16/2017 8:10:00 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Ozark Tom

I posted a link abut the 2009 incident days ago. A flow limiting ring was not installed for the testing of the ‘river valve’, and workers were instructed to open the valve to 100% for the test, also unusual, and workers expressed concerned about doing that. At 85% things fell apart and one worker was hurt badly.

Having a hard time verifying that the river valve control room is or is not still flooded...

https://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/citations/CA%20Water%20Resources%20313228637Summary.pdf

http://www.abc10.com/news/local/river-valve-damaged-in-2009-could-have-been-fourth-way-to-release-excess-water/408086236

https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/accidentsearch.accident_detail?id=202489431

http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-probe-faults-water-agency-in-oroville-dam-accident-2010feb23-story.html


60 posted on 02/17/2017 12:49:31 PM PST by polymuser (There's a yuuuge basket of deportables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson