Maybe fellow homo Guy Benson can go console Milo over some pizza slices.
Milo is practically single handedly challenging the entrenched leftist culture, a battle front that the right has ABANDONED to the media and Hollywood. You would have to be intellectually lazy not to recognize this.
Establishment GOPe, cucks & pundits only hope, pray, write books they expect us to buy and wait for young people to get mugged by reality and then move to the right. No proactive plan to win young people indoctrinated by leftist education. They like the status quo, they need the status quo!
Milo has taken the fight to the culture.
CPAC should have welcomed him with open arms based on his sole support and advocacy of the First Amendment on college campuses alone!
The never trumpers and cucks in CPAC leadership are uniting with the global Communists on the left to smear Milo! As they have always smeared people who stand up for the Constitution! They are not part of the true movement.
He should get a day in court because of the lying media and their strong will to destroy him, but any kind of NAMBLA crap and it is adios....
Let Yale and Harvard have the NAMBLA speakers as they have done in the past.
Cucks & never trumpers at CPAC are helping the left destroy the movement!
Milo should have been slated to speak at CPAC for his support of the First Amendment alone!
But anyone that stands up for the freedoms listed in Constitution is to be smeared, shunned and thrown from roof tops according to CPAC leadership!
It’s been known for centuries that homosexuality and pedirasty are entwined like the cords of a rope.
GOPe gutless wonders
Excellent decision on CPAC’s part.
I stand with Milo. F-CPAC.
Several such videos have appeared; Milo also defended pedophilia on his FB page.
He is NOT a conservative and his sick views are beyond the pale.
If conservatives stand for anything, its being committed to upholding core values.
CPAC made the right move.
Any of you who side with Milo on this better never attack the Catholic Church for sex abuse ever again.
Who cares. FudgePAC needs to be boycotted by all true conservatives. They are a homo-joke.
Hmm, I respect CPAC and think they’d be the last organization on earth to ever kowtow to liberal pressure.
They made no bones about it when they put their rejection message out... https://mobile.twitter.com/mschlapp/status/833741724694487043
For all the good he’s done in fighting against liberal bias, Milo is still a queer, and that type has known predilections for young boys that they seek to groom. He slipped and vocalized what all of his type think.
News Feed
Milo Yiannopoulos
18 hrs ·
A note for idiots (UPDATED):
I do not support pedophilia. Period. It is a vile and disgusting crime, perhaps the very worst. There are selectively edited videos doing the rounds, as part of a co-ordinated effort to discredit me from establishment Republicans, that suggest I am soft on the subject.
If it somehow comes across (through my own sloppy phrasing or through deceptive editing) that I meant any of the ugly things alleged, let me set the record straight: I am completely disgusted by the abuse of children.
Some facts to consider:
1. I have outed THREE pedophiles in my career as a journalist. That’s three more than any of my critics and a peculiar strategy for a supposed pedophile apologist.
(a) Luke Bozier, former business partner of Louise Mensch
http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/…/menshn-co-founder-embroile…/
http://kernelmag.dailydot.com/…/…/3746/luke-bozier-arrested/
(b) Nicholas Nyberg, anti-GamerGate activist who self-described as a pedophile and white nationalist
http://www.breitbart.com/…/leading-gamergate-critic-sarah-…/
(c) Chris Leydon, a London photographer who has a rape trial starting March 13 thanks to my reporting.
http://www.breitbart.com/…/tech-city-darling-chris-leydon-…/
2. I have repeatedly expressed disgust at pedophiles in my journalism.
http://www.breitbart.com/…/heres-why-the-progressive-left-…/
3. I have never defended and would never defend child abusers, as my reporting history shows. The world is messy and complicated, and I recognize it as such, as this furore demonstrates. But that is a red line for any decent person.
4. The videos do not show what people say they show. I *did* joke about giving better head as a result of clerical sexual abuse committed against me when I was a teen. If I choose to deal in an edgy way on an internet livestream with a crime I was the victim of that’s my prerogative. It’s no different to gallows humor from AIDS sufferers.
5. National Review, whose journalists are tweeting about this, published an article defending Salon for giving a pedophile a platform.
6. I did say that there are relationships between younger men and older men that can help a young gay man escape from a lack of support or understanding at home. That’s perfectly true and every gay man knows it. But I was not talking about anything illegal and I was not referring to pre-pubescent boys.
7. I said in the same “Drunken Peasants” podcast from which the footage is taken that I agree with the current age of consent.
8. I shouldn’t have used the word “boy” when I talked about those relationships between older men and younger gay men. (I was talking about my own relationship when I was 17 with a man who was 29. The age of consent in the UK is 16.) That was a mistake. Gay men often use the word “boy” when they refer to consenting adults. I understand that heterosexual people might not know that, so it was a sloppy choice of words that I regret.
9. This rush to judgment from establishment conservatives who hate Trump as much as they hate me, before I have had any chance to provide context or a response, is one of the big reasons gays vote Democrat.
10. In case there is any lingering doubt, here’s me, in the same interview the other footage is taken from, affirming that the current legal age of consent is about right: “And I think the law is probably about right. It’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about ok. But there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age. I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who were sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world, by the way.”
Since when do we condemn people for what they say?
I don’t like what a lot of people say, but I hate people who tell me what I can not say! If we deny Milo the right (under our laws) to communicate his thoughts on a topic - that he even experienced! Then we deny our own right to free speech.
If CPAC condemns him for words, they slander the Constitution and they give the globalist left the ability to deny all of us the ability to wish each other a Merry Christmas!
Finally, Milo is from Europe. Europeans are not so hung up on sex as we are. Culturally, I give him a wide berth to discuss a topic that may not be so polarizing there. Although his record stands for itself. Like Milo, I do not support pedophilia.
#FakeNews
I’ll let Milo speak for himself:
I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.
I would like to restate my utter disgust at adults who sexually abuse minors. I am horrified by pedophilia and I have devoted large portions of my career as a journalist to exposing child abusers. I’ve outed three of them, in fact — three more than most of my critics. And I’ve repeatedly expressed disgust at pedophilia in my feature and opinion writing. My professional record is very clear.
But I do understand that these videos, even though some of them are edited deceptively, paint a different picture.
I’m partly to blame. My own experiences as a victim led me to believe I could say anything I wanted to on this subject, no matter how outrageous. But I understand that my usual blend of British sarcasm, provocation and gallows humor might have come across as flippancy, a lack of care for other victims or, worse, “advocacy.” I deeply regret that. People deal with things from their past in different ways.
As to some of the specific claims being made, sometimes things tumble out of your mouth on these long, late-night live-streams, when everyone is spit-balling, that are incompletely expressed or not what you intended.
Nonetheless, I’ve reviewed the tapes that appeared last night in their proper full context and I don’t believe they say what is being reported.
I do not advocate for illegal behavior. I explicitly say on the tapes that I think the current age of consent is “about right.”
I do not believe sex with 13-year-olds is okay. When I mentioned the number 13, I was talking about the age I lost my own virginity.
I shouldn’t have used the word “boy” — which gay men often do to describe young men of consenting age — instead of “young man.” That was an error.
I am certainly guilty of imprecise language, which I regret.
Anyone who suggests I turn a blind eye to illegal activity or to the abuse of minors is unequivocally wrong. I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia and I will continue to report and speak accordingly.
Don’t ever be a faggot. That’s the lesson. Just don’t.
Don’t ever be a faggot. That’s the lesson. Just don’t.
Hit job. Probably from the RINOs.