Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2017 6:30:00 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: alarm rider; alrea; Apple Pan Dowdy; Auntie Mame; BatGuano; Battle Axe; bayouranger; bboop; ...
Mike Adams

Please Freepmail me if you want to be added, readded, or removed


2 posted on 02/23/2017 6:31:22 AM PST by Kaslin ( Start by doing what's necessary; then do what's possible; and suddenly you are doing the impossible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Great analysis.


3 posted on 02/23/2017 10:29:23 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
There are two ways to respond to this unsupported assertion. One is to simply quote from embryology textbooks, which uniformly conclude that the unborn is a distinct, living, and whole human being from the point of conception. Another is to share images of what the unborn child looks like at the earliest stages when surgical abortion is performed, which is around seven weeks after conception. By choosing this latter option, one can simply count the clearly discernible fingers on the “blob of tissue” and see that more than one body is involved. Pregnant women don’t have four hands and twenty fingers.

Or we could just look at the DNA: when does the baby develop its own DNA sequence? the easiest/least arguable way to end the argument is that once the baby's DNA changes from the mom's into its own, would be the dividing line when it's no longer just the mom's body but also her kid's.
4 posted on 02/23/2017 12:50:21 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson