Ok so.. they apply for a warrant with FISA in june and were turned down. Then in October they appealed (diffrent then FISA court) an got a warrant ... the appeals court was three Clinton appointed judges...
Now if during that gap beween june and oct they were taping.
And there is suggestion from Hillary tweets that she had some information concerning it even before Oct
Because I guess evidence that was collected pending the appeal could not be used in Court. But its does not stop illegal use of the information for political reasons
Really this let someone start a tap with no warrant.
And even if you never get a warrant approved that just means what you collect can’t be used in court ...
But it does not stop them illegally using it for political purposes. Just like they did with flynn
And even if you never get a warrant approved that just means what you collect can’t be used in court ...
But it does not stop them illegally using it for political purposes. Just like they did with flynn
It's amazing, isn't it? We live in a police state. No doubt about it. But I'm ready to stop fighting like a girl. Trump needs to completely blanket surveil every single subversive organization being funded by Soros, as well as Obama's OFA 2 blocks from the WH. Do it today. This has to stop.
I think you are on to something - I was wondering about the judges that okayed the request.
The only reason they got the second FISA warrant was because they made the two Russian banks the subject of the inquiry. Then a warrantless wiretap could be put in place without PROBABLE CAUSE even. They could listen to Trump Tower til the cows came home under the guise of investigating the Russian banks.
“And there is suggestion from Hillary tweets that she had some information concerning it even before Oct...”
So even if obama and/or his minions can justify the possible wire taps with regard to “national security” - they won’t be able to justify giving that information to a political candidate.
Well - maybe they could.
“Ms. Clinton, as a former Secretary of State, as per EO 666xx666, is cleared for any and all data that may pertain to her previous duties in order to safeguard.....”