They got it from the RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR.
He is a DNC MOLE.
(haven’t read the article yet but will now) A lot of folks have been very critical of Trump having tweeted out his accusation of wiretapping/bugging by the 0bama admin (whether by CIA, FBI, or any of several other agys)
I think it was an extremely gutsy move, a chess brilliancy. Because it brought HIS accusation whether true, false, spurious, or random, to exactly the same level as the accusations against him. And it inherently demands equal investigation; because if true, it is astonishingly serious. It was a very “see you and raise you” move.
The question remains, if the NYTimes is reporting that “transcripts of Flynns’ convos with the Russian Ambassador” revealed....whatever they revealed...HOW IN BLAZES DID THEY GET transcripts...without wiretapping? It’s nobody but the Times itself that claimed there were “transcripts of wiretaps” quote unquote. Now they aren’t so sure...?
The enemy is trying to spin it as Trump having a temper tantrum on Saturday and thus, being unfit for office.
You don’t build a multi billion dollar business enterprise by being emotionally unstable. Look to those who’ve never had an actual Grown Up job to do the childish acting out.
I think Andy McCarthy nails it, as he so often does.
> The question remains, if the NYTimes is reporting that “transcripts of Flynns’ convos with the Russian Ambassador” revealed....whatever they revealed...HOW IN BLAZES DID THEY GET transcripts...without wiretapping?
There’s really only one way, which is gallows-eligible.
you have well stated the issue. The publishers should be hauled in to jail until they reveal the source of the material they published.
It was brilliant on several levels.
“convos”
I’ve seen liberal writers use that word, but have no idea what they’re talking about.
They got it from the RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR.
He is a DNC MOLE.