Posted on 03/13/2017 11:12:15 AM PDT by TigerClaws
That'd be something - only topped by watching the New York Times and Washington Post find ways to ignore the story.
For their own reasons, Russia wants to destroy the EU. To the extent they can, they will intervene in this years elections in Holland, France, Germany and Italy.
In Holland, France and Italy the anti-EU parties have a chance to win the election.
In Germany, Alternative for Germany is clearly anti-EU, but currently has too little support to be expected to win an election.
So Russia’s choice in Germany is to try to influence an election outcome which empowers pro-russia politicians and does maximum harm to the future of the EU.
It’s not clear which mainstream parties in Germany would be better for Russia and worse for the EU: Merkel or Sgt. Schultz/Green/Left.
Russia might just use wikileaks to discredit all of the mainstream parties in Germany. I’m sure they have bought or compromised many politicians in Germany (eg. Gerhard Schroeder).
She was going to meet Trump in NY?
The CIA is TF squared and can’t be fixed.
I am wondering if the Merkel intercepts deal with her relationship with George Soros. we as Americans like to think of what the intercepts mean for Americans but I have a feeling they will be more explosive for Germany and destructive To Markel’s campaign for reelection.
His attitude may have also changed when he learned Miss Hillary wanted to plant a drone up his rear.
That might sour a friendship, yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.