Sneaky porn? The actresses are dressed as the Hamburgler?
Posted on 03/15/2017 10:05:32 AM PDT by deplorableindc
Millions of viewrs?
On MSNBC? I doubt it.
Maybe BOTH of them...
The guy who publicized the stolen returns was too damned stupid and bitter to understand he gave Trump a major victory.
What did we learn?
Trump is a billionaire (this we knew) and he made a lot of money but he paid a lot in taxes too which proves Hillary wrong when she claimed that he didn't pay any Fed taxes.
When I think how they gushed over that obama hag....that reporter would be carried out on a rail. Instead it will be up to Melania to sue this queen. She is the First Lady. How dare you? He should be still looking for his teeth.
Sneaky porn? The actresses are dressed as the Hamburgler?
Didn’t Melania already win or settle a lawsuit about the fake porn news?
Looks like she will win another suit. Maybe she can get his Pulitzer.
Melanie is not a doormat. I hope MSNBC receives a letter putting them on notice.
These so-called reporters know nothing of business. To say a business owner is strange to have a salary is just plain stupid as the conflate the business as being a personal sieve for the owner. Any good businessman or woman is going to pay themselves a salary rather than just dip into the business’ funds anytime they want. By paying themselves a wage and/or salary they separate themselves from the business. In other words these reporters are stupider than a box of rocks when it comes to business and anything they say about it is fake news.
This is the perfect capstone to the disaster that this “scoop” was for Maddow. The screwball that she had on as the credible journalistic source claims that the First Lady did porn — not just porn but “sneaky” porn, whatever that is. Trump’s election is the gift that keeps on giving.
Some just never know when to stop diggin..
Hope they get slapped with defamation suits..amongst other charges..
“Unusual” for a CEO or owner to have W-2 income?
These people are STUPID beyond belief.
Oh, btw the highest capital gains rate for 2005 was 15%. For liberals, Dims (the ones who do work and invest), independents, moderates, non voters . . .
The level of ignorance I see in the “media” and on “TV” is just incredible. Even liberals should understand these basic concepts.
Maybe it was rehearsed that way.
Sux to be this guy. After he loses the lawsuit with Melania, he'll have to supplement his income by doing commercials with the "ShamWOW" guy.
Every CEO I have ever worked for was paid as a W2 employee. The wages and salary number in the box 1 of their W2 was a lot bigger than mine. You are right, those reporters are stupid and ignorant. Some of them are OK at acting smart.
No, it isn't. It means he had a JOB!
White trash. He is just plain white trash. Lots of them are.
Millions? I sincerely doubt that.
Sooo. The MSM is going back to “Malania is a hooker” meme. Keep it up MSM. Keep reporting these things always and loudly for all to see. If you can’t destroy Trump, destroy his family. It will only strengthen the resolve of Trump and his supporters.
This guy is an f'ing moron. O'Donnell knows nothing about Trump's finances, especially in 2005. Neither do I, but when Trump divested form his companies this year, I thought he mentioned he was involved in 600+ companies. Why would it be unusual for many or even 1 of these companies to pay him wages?
I have many clients who are the sole shareholders in their own S-Corp, who pay themselves wages. As a matter of fact, the IRS requires S-Corps to pay their officers a salary.
Why would it be unusual for Trump to have done some consulting or some deal where a company paid him wages?
Of course it could be Melania's wages.
These idiots know absolutely nothing, but are pulling wild speculations from their a$$es.
Yeah, but with a lot more sham and a lot less wow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.