Of course, sure why not.
Perhaps the stank ass judge should just move into the White House.
Rearrange the deck chairs on the Ninth Circus.
The judicial branch plays tag team. This game can go on for a decade, no sweat.
Take off the gloves... NOW.
2) Trump should ignore this injunction. This order has constitutional basis and there is no constitutional basis for stopping it. A constitutional mandate of the federal government reads as follows:
The United States shall...protect [every state] against invasion. U.S. Const. Article VI, Section 4.
BTW, the rule of law in the United States is this:
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof...shall be the supreme law of the land. U.S. Const. Art VI, Cl 2.
First and foremost the Constitution is the law of the land. Secondly, any federal law (or ruling) MUST be made IN PURSUANCE thereof (constitutionally based) to be valid law. Any federal laws/decisions violating the Constitution are invalid and should be nullified and ignored as long as a constitutionally-based rationale is provided.
So, again, the CONSTITUTION, not any old federal law or decision, is the RULE OF LAW in America. The feds are UNDER the rule of law of the Constitution. It behooves us to get to know our Constitution. It is our only legal bulwark of freedom against the tyranny of the feds.
I advocate totally ignoring these globalist communist judges and close their court and block entrance with marines!!
The constitution seems to indicate that Scotus has original jurisdiction in cases involving states. What prevents Trump insisting this go directly to Scotus?
For that matter, should a lesser court even be allowed to hear a case in which a state is disputing a federal action?