Posted on 03/27/2017 3:14:40 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Angry Patriot) – America is finally starting to fight back against the Muslim invasion, even if it is only one state at a time.
Montana is spearheading legislation to keep Sharia Law from being implemented within its borders, this time FOR GOOD. Senate Bill 97, which was proposed by Sen. Keith Regier, prohibits state courts from using foreign laws, just advanced in the House with a 56-44 vote. (via Billings Gazette).
It is truly astonishing how the Democrats have such little respect for our founding fathers, that they were able to muster up 44 votes to ensure the savage ideals of Sharia Law remaining an option for U.S judges to force on the American people.
The fact that even “moderate” Muslims view Sharia Law as being superior to our American common law system is not only disturbing, but also nightmarish. Liberals can’t even concede to the notion that foreign laws should not be used in the American court system, ever!
Democrats are still hanging on to the idea laws such as Senate Bill 97 are “anti-Muslim,” but that is far from the case. Sharia is beyond extreme — just ask any woman who has been disfigured “legally” by her spouse because she merely glanced at another man.
The fact is these migrants have no respect for our way of life, period. They are blatantly trying to turn America into an extension of the Middle East, and We the People will not allow that to happen.
Putting the Islamic religion aside for a second, how arrogant does one have to be to literally get “upset” that a country who accepts them with open arms will not just willingly accept them imposing THEIR ridiculous laws on our people?
As a self-proclaimed patriot and staunch supporter of the Constitution, I had to take a moment of solitude to reflect on the men and women who risk their lives every day to uphold the rights we as Americans often take for granted, and I will NOT let the left use the same old guilt-trip tactics to coerce my feelings and try to convince me Sharia Law is anything but barbaric, third world, utter nonsense.
You know your position is garbage when you are forced to use and exploit the whole “think about the children” argument — as Democrat Rep. Laurie Bishop so clearly demonstrated. “Let’s not forget the roots of this bill,” she said. “Let’s not forget that our children are watching.”
Yes, I agree, Ms. Bishop: our children ARE watching — and the last thing I want them to see is someone getting stoned to death in the local park because they decided to draw a cartoon which had a slight resemblance to Islam’s prophet.
A final vote on the new legislation will take place on Tuesday, and will then head to the governor’s desk for his signature or veto.
For the sake of judicial precedent and the preservation of American rights we have fought to uphold, let’s pray Governor Steve Bullock makes the right decision and that we can all view Montana as a leader in taking a stand on what is fundamentally right.
If the bill passes and it is signed into law, Montana will be setting the example every state in our republic needs to follow.
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/muslims-furious-after-montana/
‘I willl bet 3 year’s pay.
Nice.... on a horse this big...
First thing that came to mind.
Good. The NWO can pound sand.
Democraps are like the HIV virus that destroys the host’s ability to defend itself against other microbes. (illegal immigrants, jihadis, criminals, etc)
it had to be said
but I'm not trying
to hijack the thread. :)
Yippy-Ty-O-Ty-Ay
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend”... Left only wants Islam to neutralize Christianity...
Montana muslims should migrate to Los Angeles
(Yippy-Ty-O-Ty-Ay)
People on our side can learn more about DEMOCRATS when they watch the reactions and the votes to outlaw something that they claim is ‘is not a threat’ and ‘does not exist (in this country)’. Yet they vote to protect it, so that it can slip in (I guess). They claim the bills ‘not needed’ and therefore vote against them.
Here in Texas, I have to get my cars ‘safety-inspected’ every year by people that likely know less about cars, and certainly less than myself. Yet, I guess, these laws are ‘needed’, when at least half of the states, including California, don’t even require safety inspections? Why aren’t the Democrats pushing to get rid of that law, and likely thousands of other, similar, laws?
Answer - there’s more to it.
Interesting. All the People’s Republik of Maryland requires from me, speaking of car safety, is an emissions inspection every 2 years. I would only need a safety inspection if I was planning on selling the car to another private individual, as far as I know.
Remember the co-founder of CAIR is quoted as saying that Islam is not just another religion in the USA but to be the dominant religion and the Quran the Constitution.
No different than gang members or any other group of criminals forcing their laws on other people. How a sane american judge can actually allow a group to decide what laws to obey and what laws to ignore is incomprehensible.
Isn't it really cold there?
A couple of summers ago I was talking to a motel owner in Maine, who had moved there from Montana. We joked that he moved to Maine for the mild winters.
I camped in Glacier Nat’l once and wore everything I’d brought one day, after the snow the previous night.
Seriously, I think it depends on where you are.
Capt. Vasili Borodin: I will live in Montana. And I will marry a round American woman and raise rabbits, and she will cook them for me. And I will have a pickup truck... maybe even a “recreational vehicle.” And drive from state to state. Do they let you do that?
Captain Ramius: I suppose.
Capt. Vasili Borodin: No papers?
Captain Ramius: No papers, state to state.
Capt. Vasili Borodin: Well then, in winter I will live in Arizona. Actually, I think I will need two wives.
Captain Ramius: Oh, at least.
13 seconds. GMTA.
I think in nearly all cases, states are just in no hurry to change these laws. So if they were around 40 or 50 years ago, they’re still around. And vice versa.
Maryland was a far different state back then...as FedGov was a far different entity (roughly half its size, if that, relative to GNP, if military spending is excluded). The feds back then didn’t create an entire industry in MD and Northern Virginia.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.