[WENDLE]

What a joke he is now. Get lost!!

[SMARTY]

WHAT the h%&l difference does it make IF the Russians were involved or IF Hillary accepted MILLIONS from foreign powers (likely the enemies of the US)and HAS BEEN accepting funds from abroad for DECADES?

I mean-Let’s get REAL here!

[1217Chic]

Go shoot something Dicky o boy.....

[romanesq]

Unreal. Makes me regret any support for the Bush family.
Much regret. :(

[Ohioan]

What there is no doubt of--none whatsoever--is that Obama tried to interfere in the British Brexit election. Obama issued an unveiled threat in a public address, which fortunately the Brits ignored.

Chaney has had moments over the past two generations, when he had sensible things to say; this is not one of them.

This vague allegation against Russia & Putin in particular needs to be assessed in the context that Russia has morphed under Putin into something very different than it was from the Bolshevik Revolution until the 1990s. In what is almost certainly the single most important issue of our times, Putin understands the importance of preserving the ethnic cultures of the world's peoples.

Any Russian Government today, which would just passively accept the idea of America's self-destructing in favor of a globalist humanist/collectivist world order, would be as treasonous to Russian interests as the Clinton/Obama cabal is treasonous to our interests.

No, they do not have a license to directly interfere in our election, anymore than Obama or the Clintons have any license to continue to meddle in other nations internal affairs. But Chaney's remarks here strike me as a case of the pot vilifying the kettle.