Good thing her boss didn't pull any strings.....
Posted on 04/04/2017 9:24:19 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
According to Bolton, Rice had to have a legitimate national security reason to make unmasking, etc. requests of the NSA.
And if she gave what sounded like a legitimate reason when her real reason was political, she's in trouble.
Until we have people in the DoJ that are willing to do the right thing, you are correct.
Yeah, Tom. I hope it’s not the case.
I hear Rush warn all the time citing that classic rope a dope BJ Clinton pulled on us back then.
Yeah, DJT is no one to f with, that's for sure.
The man knows what he's doing, and he knows how to get things done. That gives me great hope.
He's smarter than any MSM-Democrat, I'm certain of that.
But I don't know if he's nastier, and that's what's needed here, I'm afraid.
It appears we’ve got quite a cabal among the unelected bureaucratic class in DC, always acting in collusion with their patrons, Democrats. If there is no severe penalty to be paid, they will only be emboldened. Regardless of the symbolism or outward appearances, they’ve got to be taken out, taken down and thoroughly discredited whenever they’re legally in the wrong and that can be clearly demonstrated. Skating on this is a very bad idea.
Much better explanation than Bolton’s:
Why Susan Rice’s Reported ‘Unmasking’ of Trump Officials Raises Very Serious Legal Concerns for Her
http://lawnewz.com/opinion/susan-rice-may-have-committed-crime-if-she-circulated-trump-team-intercepts-for-politicized-purposes/
FR thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3540913/posts
Why is CNN so wrong on this stuff. They are doing the opposite from journolists.
[Why is CNN so wrong on this stuff?]
Shirley, surely you must be joking.....;)
I posted it because Bolton described the process by which Rice would have had to get Trump and his people unmasked (i.e. by submission of a legitimate reason to the NSA).
I believe it's because their financial future has nothing to do with them "reporting the news" or acting as "journalists."
I believe they're being paid by individuals and organizations that are unrelated to their advertisers.
I believe they've been bought and paid for by wealthy people both inside and outside our country.
The Washington Post is owned by a dot-com billionaire.
The New York Times is owned by a Mexican billionaire.
I suspect that big money interests have also essentially bought the Democrat party outright, and maybe the Republican party as well.
It wouldn't really cost that much, especially since most of the politicians in Washington want to be bought. They don't even make it much of a secret.
I don't think I ever said that you wrote the headline.
But the headline does contain the words "Susan Rice is in real legal jeopardy," does it not?
That's what I was objecting to.
Has Bolton ever been right?
“Stop this.
Just stop it.
Nothing is going to happen to Susan Rice.
Stop raising people’s expectations. This is an old Democrat trick. Remember Bill Clinton’s “secret Grand Jury testimony” ?
No Obama administration figures are going to be prosecuted, or tried, or fitted for an orange jump suit. Just forget about that.
They’re setting us up for a fall, folks.”
I really hate what you are saying here, but thank you for speaking the truth.
Now there’s an Obama souvenir worth $1!!!
She will just take the 5th and nothing will ever be done about it thanks to the gutless repubs, FBI and all the other worthless bastards that are supposed to take action when these things happen.
I will consider your concern the next time I post one.
Hey Suzie...ya gonna crash and burn for Oboobo?
Yes, but there is one big difference on this scandal.
Because secret documents were involved there is a paper trail, probably in multiple locations. This removes the usual “he said/she said” defense arguments common in other political scandals.
Thanks for posting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.