[Bob434]

As much as it pains us, and as much as we wish to see liars prosecuted, we must look at this objectively-

[[Susan Rice is a liar. We need to establish that as the baseline.]]

Yes we all know she is- but beign a liar doesn’t automatically make one guilty of a felony- Breaking federal laws makes one a felon- Can they establish that she broke a specific federal law and committed a felony?

[[The thing to bear in mind is that the White House does not do investigations.]]

She didn’t do the investigation- She simply ordered the unmasking at the behest of intel community (Melissa Zimmerman and Adam Hoiwsley made that claim last night on BOR)

—It Appears— at this point, that ‘protocol was followed’, and although her actions may have ‘violated established government policy’ but violating policy doesn’t necessarily lead to a title of felony-

I’ll post my previous post here because it all boils down ot one simple concept- “Did she actually break specific law herself, If so, did it rise to the level of felony?”

It sucks that she may skate- but she may very well because it is unclear that she actually broke the law- UNLESS they can directly link her to leaking the classified info- which is ifnact a very specific crime- provable crime- then unfortunately it looks like she covered her bases in order to avoid prosecution - Here’s what i wrote earlier- It’s a little long, but it boils it down to it’s basic premise- all this other stuff folks are talking about is wandering in the weeds- the basic question that needs ot be answered is this “Did Susan rice herself break any law?”, and at this point, it appears n ot- Was what she did unethical? You betcha- Was it political? Absolutely- but good luck proving that- Here’s what was psoted-

[[(2) Did you sign this at the direction of someone, or on your own accord?]]

It appears at this point that it was at the behest of the intel community-

[[Ergo, if Rice is on-record as having signed the log to review secure documents, she can neither claim 5A or Exec-Privilege.]]

She won’t have to- it will be the burden of the prosecution to prove that it was done for political reasons and not for an actual investigative reason (doesn’t matter what the reason for hte investigation is- that is a non issue- the left are claiming it was for determining a connection to russia- but that is just a distraction- the left —will— come up with a number of reasons to justify their ‘concerns’ (false concerns) that led them to order the unmasking)

in my previous post- i laid out how i understand the process to work- (again, i could be wrong- I’m not up on these things really- just going on basic info I’ve heard)

According ot Melissa Zimmerman- it appears that there is info coming out that she did these things, through ‘proper channels’ at the behest of the intel community

King from NY was just on right now and said the info dissemination was ‘either illegal, contrary to government policy’

The sticking point in all this- the key point is this- Was it actually illegal or not? Being simply ‘contrary to government policy’ is meaningless as it is not against the law to be ‘contrary to gov policy’-

The dissemination —Must be-— illegal in order to convict someone like rice directly- IF the order to unmask can even be proven to have come solely from her-

The fact is- rice and obama were not dumb- they were very very sneaky, And they have very very sneaky scummy lawyers advising them the whole way on how to avoid being directly implicated in anything- They very likely covered their tracks pretty thoroughly-

But we’ll see how thoroughly soon- hopefully this gets exposed wide open-

[Art in Idaho]

The fact is- rice and obama were not dumb- they were very very sneaky, And they have very very sneaky scummy lawyers advising them the whole way on how to avoid being directly implicated in anything- They very likely covered their tracks pretty thoroughly- But we’ll see how thoroughly soon- hopefully this gets exposed wide open-

So true and so predictable with the rats. We are at war with them, so let's get in the ring and may the winner take all.

Make them go through the hearings, House and Senate, have the FBI and Sessions investigate to the hilt. Expect Rogers at NSA to do his own investigation. Grab the news cycle every day. We have to fight this like it's war - which it is, for the soul of our Republic. Make the public thoroughly understand how sneaky and pathetic they are. . always skirting the illegal, always plausible denial, always, "I don't recall, always some slick legal obfuscation, . . as we're looking ahead to 2018.

The public should know this after all the shenanigans with the Clintons over the years, but hey, a little more education won't hurt.