Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

That option has been on the table for weeks. That’s why is boggles peoples minds that the DIMs let it get to this point. They are basically blowing their one negotiation on a nominee whose election will not change the makeup of the court (electing a ‘Scalia’ to replace Scalia). But they squandered their chance.


183 posted on 04/06/2017 9:17:55 AM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: LoneStarGI
That’s why is boggles peoples minds that the DIMs let it get to this point. They are basically blowing their one negotiation on a nominee whose election will not change the makeup of the court (electing a ‘Scalia’ to replace Scalia). But they squandered their chance.

The Dems do NOT want the Supremes to agree that Trump has the power to bar foreigners from entering the US, according to whatever criteria Trump deems necessary for national security. They do NOT want Trump to stop the flood of Third Worlders to the US.

195 posted on 04/06/2017 9:22:44 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson