We didn;t believe the news outlets in the campaign, and aren’t impressed now. I think we all are much smarter now.
89%?? That would imply 11% positive coverage, and I haven’t seen 1, not 1 single story regarding Trump in any outlet that I would consider MSM to be positive... other than some brief positive analysis over his bombing of Syria.
Otherwise haven’t seen anything else out of the MSM I would consider positive, its all negative, to neutral at best.
Not only 89% negative. 89% LIES.
Already posted: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3545370/posts
Our local rag is 100%. Even if CNN or AP (they link direct to them) accidentally report a positive sentence about Trump they ALWAYS fill up the rest of the article with “but there are experts” to bash everything republican related. Example...
“Regulation elimination will save 50 billion dollars but millions of children will be killed”
Not quite so hyperbolic but pretty close.
At best that would be 89% negative, 11% neutral and 0% positive. However I believe it is closer to 100% negative.
The media have decided that they are no longer partisan. They should have to file the proper forms for electioneering since that’s what they’re doing.
“Liberal Media vs President Trump”
Should be
“Democrat Ministry of Propaganda vs President Trump”.
IMHO
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
Stop patronizing the parent companies: Disney, Comcast, Time Warner
get the real skinny sign up, you will not believe what you are not hearing on the fake news networks