Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alas Babylon!

I always presumed ‘new coke’ was just a gimmick to a) introduce a new product with the intent of retaining the old one, b) a low cost way to create ‘buzz’ and advertising.


16 posted on 04/24/2017 10:44:05 AM PDT by posterchild (Treade a worme on the tayle, and it must turne agayne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: posterchild

No, they stuck with it a year or more. Nobody liked it and their sales plummeted.

They hurt the overall brand badly. Many executives lost their Jobs, and a lot more when some bottlers closed shop. I had a friend who worked for a Coke bottler and lost his job for sure.

I don’t think Classic Coke came out for at least a year after New Coke replaced it.


58 posted on 04/24/2017 11:20:55 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: posterchild

I think that “New Coke” was the way they disguised the switch from real cane sugar to HFCS.

The product was similar enough they called it Coke, but it was just a ruse to aid in forgetting how original Coke tasted. Then they “brought back by popular demand” Coca-Cola Classic (note, not just Coca-Cola, even though New Coke was a different brand).

Coca-Cola Classic is the original recipe with HFCS substituted for real cane sugar.

If you want to taste what Coke is supposed to taste like, buy a bottle of Mexican Coke. Really, it tastes just like it did when we were kids.


113 posted on 04/24/2017 5:34:51 PM PDT by Don W (When blacks riot, neighbourhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson