Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., China talk firmer U.N. response to North Korea's missiles: diplomats
Reuters ^ | Michelle Nichols

Posted on 05/02/2017 12:43:34 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

The United States is negotiating with China on a possible stronger U.N. Security Council response - such as sanctions - to North Korea's repeated ballistic missile launches, which the 15-member body normally condemns in a statement, diplomats said.

It was not immediately clear how open Beijing might be to new sanctions. The council has traditionally boosted sanctions in response to North Korea's five nuclear tests and two long-range rocket launches.

Sanctions were first imposed on Pyongyang in 2006.

North Korea has in the past year stepped up its missile tests, firing dozens of various types of rockets, according to South Korea. The most recent test, which failed, came on Friday following a U.N. Security Council meeting on North Korea, chaired by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

"The cumulative actions of the DPRK (North Korea) since their last nuclear test compel us to look at a range of measures that would apply pressure," said a spokesman for the U.S. Permanent Mission to the United Nations on Tuesday.

"As Secretary Tillerson said on Friday, business as usual is not an option. We are exploring options for a response to this series of provocations with our Security Council colleagues," the spokesman said.

Tillerson on Friday urged the Security Council to act before North Korea does.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nikihaley; northkorea; tillerson; trump

1 posted on 05/02/2017 12:43:34 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; onyx; Jane Long; V K Lee; RitaOK; Black Agnes; PennsylvaniaMom; Fai Mao; Fiddlstix; ...

Ping.


2 posted on 05/02/2017 12:46:34 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Waste of time.


3 posted on 05/02/2017 12:53:18 PM PDT by Harpotoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo
Trump is showing China and Russia that it is willing to exhaust the alternatives. That's why Trump said it would be an "honor" to meet with Kim. Saving face is important in Oriental cultures.

That said, it is indeed a waste of time.

Kim is going to be removed and his nuclear development operations are going to be destroyed...one way or another.

And it will be in the very near future. This is why our ships are all in the neighborhood. We are putting the infrastructure in place for action as soon as Kim carries out one more relatively significant provocation.

4 posted on 05/02/2017 1:08:23 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Fiction.

“Firmer” in a U.N. sense means: oh look out the words issued by the U.N. will be “harsher”!!! That will really get little Kim to change!! NOT.


5 posted on 05/02/2017 1:30:07 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Trump and Tillerson are merely advising the international community that the SHTF moment is nigh.

Best to have a coalition even if we do all the heavy lifting.

6 posted on 05/02/2017 1:47:45 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

How much is Kim Jong Un going to be affected by a UN resolution?


7 posted on 05/02/2017 1:57:06 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Exactly, UN &China are a waste of time.

“Kim Jong Un’s leadership of the DPRK is unstable and that Kim himself might be mentally unstable.”

http://38north.org/2017/02/mmadden021417/


8 posted on 05/02/2017 2:23:02 PM PDT by wiseone (india,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

SHTF??


9 posted on 05/03/2017 4:53:32 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Sh!t hits the fan.


10 posted on 05/03/2017 5:02:18 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson