Crap in, crap out.
AI has to start with baseline assumptions.
Those assumptions are only valid if one tells the truth .
No way it accounts for blackmail.
Nor fake resumes being conservative up to the time of appointment, like Souter or Kennedy.
Fake news forme “Science”...furthermore, Science is a lefty mag and anything they cover will be lefty scientists with lefty assumptions to feed their AI algorithms.
Can it account for chaos theory like butterfly wings or Roberts’ blackmail?
Nope.
It could have been easily included in the analysis. I can only conclude it was found not to have been important. The analysis will tell you whether or not a proposed variable is or is not important enough to include in the model.Nor fake resumes being conservative up to the time of appointment, like Souter or Kennedy.
Again, that variable could easily be tested for its importance and then be included or excluded from the model. If I were doing it, I would definitely test for it to see if it was important. But if it weren't, I wouldn't try to force it. I could see this one going either way.Can it account for chaos theory like butterfly wings or Roberts’ blackmail?
Are butterfly wings important?No. Don't even have to do an analysis of that one.