Posted on 05/23/2017 7:14:47 AM PDT by rktman
For Carter, the fractured relationship between police and the African-American communities they serve is an issue of trust.
“I feel like the police don’t trust the communities that they’re protecting, and I feel like the police don’t trust the people that they’re supposed to be protecting, and if we can figure out a way to build this trust between the police and the community, I think we’ll have a better dynamic going forward,” Carter said.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
The supremes have ruled that no law enforcement agency has an obligation to protect anyone.
The problem isn’t cops. Its Democrats. Its hard to make a Democrat understand that his own party and his own ideology is the root of his problems.
What if the Supremes had ruled that all law enforcement agencies have an obligation to protect everyone?
Interestingly enough his cheerleading positive entrepreneur free market enterprise message is one of the prime things that is missing and that doesn't cost him a dime.
Its like Bill Belachick winning with nobodies while Brady was suspended or better Jim Harbaraugh going to Michigan and all of sudden they are competitive. A good leader can take the most precious resource a country has - its people - and make them.
Go in those inner cities and talk to the Blacks trapped there help them to become a success - deliver a message of hope Mr. President.
What do you got to lose??? Down with dope up with hope
Never happen. Your protection is/should be, your #1 responsibility.
Police have indemnification. Meaning, they can't be held responsible for getting to the scene of a crime to late to save a life, or prevent a robbery, etc.
If they didn't have it, there would be 1000's of lawsuits a day.
Why would anyone care what this guy thinks?
“The supremes have ruled that no law enforcement agency has an obligation to protect anyone.”
What if the Supremes had ruled that all law enforcement agencies have an obligation to protect everyone?
what if frogs had wings......
He should be struggling with the fact that muslims want them dead. But no, it’s those naughty cops he’s got to be worried about.
Then a whole lot of speed tra, err, revenue generation would be lost.
Win/win.
To me, the post by exnavy was a form of snark, because we all know that the police can't protect everyone, and the Supremes understood, that because of civil lawsuits, it would collapse the system if officers owed a duty to protect someone or everyone. The reply was also snark because frogs can't fly, and it was an unnecessary snark.
They wouldn't bump their @$$ when they hopped.
When i posted the supremes ruling it in reference to the whining in the article. It was the frog comment that was to you. What is a snark.
Yup!
You can add in 50% of RINO’s underneath your statement as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.