That’s a nice pipeline you’ve got there, Vlad. Be a shame if anything happened to it.
Syria hardly seems worth it
...They have very limited capability in Syria by comparison to U.S. capability...
Ok.
“We’ll never fire first. But if he fires one, I’ll fire one.”
“Fire one!”
There is nothing the democrats and Never Trumpers would like more than to have President Trump become involved in another shooting war to totally distract everyone from implementing his domestic agenda.
(Well - let’s just say it would be their favorite right after impeachment and a real beheading)
I hope Keane doesn’t have to eat those words!
What the hell am I reading here. Are you people actually saying that if our aircraft are attacked while over Syrian territory by the Russians, we should ignore them, take the hit, not fight back, what?
Poking the bear seems risky. Would we really have an easy time of it against Russia/Iran/NorthKorea/Syria and maybe Turkey ?(Edrogen is not amused about possible US involvement in the coup) How much help would we get from NATO? Europe is burning.
I thought we were only going after ISIS. We should not still be training and arming "friendly rebels" in Syria. One can't help but suspect that some of them are rogues, "friendly rebels" for a paycheck and ISIS sympathizers in their free time.
I'm not liking this, not at all. Too many crazies such as McCain on the loose in DC, controlling the "facts" and setting the agenda.
So if Iran was to hoist a couple of poorly guided NK missiles towards Syria, to “retaliate” against the bombing of their Khomeini shrine ...
what are our wonderful USAF pilots and planes doing bombing Syria?
(and with all respect for the general, I would’nt be making such belligerent statements, and especially not while invading a Russian ally’s country....just saying...the Russians are not cowards...)
Hey General,
You wanna hop into the back seat and go on a few missions? (Oh and by the way, leave the parachute in the hangar)