Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OrangeHoof

This case was about a State refusing to give funds to a church because it was a church. I think the Free Exercise Clause of the 1st Amendment is an important issue.


8 posted on 06/26/2017 7:22:07 AM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal 16-17

A part of the Missouri constitution forbids the state from funding any church. I believe it was put in to prevent the funding of parochial schools which were and still are pretty prominent in many parts of the state. So because of this clause, the state can reimburse any group that provides for rubber safety coverings for playgrounds except churches.


27 posted on 06/26/2017 8:03:44 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal 16-17

I think it’s playing with fire for a church to accept funds from the government. Surely, any agreement of such comes with strings attached.


41 posted on 06/26/2017 7:40:48 PM PDT by OrangeHoof (Get used to it - President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson