A woman cannot be the biological father of a child, but according to legislators masquerading as justices, the state must pretend that she is.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: reaganaut1
Gay Couples Entitled to Equal Treatment on Birth Certificates, Justices Rule This is why we need to get Kennedy and the other liberal kooks off the court.
29 posted on
06/26/2017 10:46:51 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: reaganaut1
What happens when the kid gets to be 12=18 and runs his DNA? Gays get divorced at a higher rate than straights. He’s going to find out the big lie. How’s it going to mess with his head, especially if, as most do, he grows up straight and the child wants to change his birth certificate to single mother parent, which he may not now be able to do now?
And what if a woman decides to be un-gay and decides to marry a man instead? That child is set up for having a gay influence ‘ex’ in his life for 18 years, compliments of a court who designated the ‘ex’ as ‘parent’. How’s that going to go over?
30 posted on
06/26/2017 10:53:35 AM PDT by
blueplum
( ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017))
To: reaganaut1
So now birth certificates have become meaningless and unhelpful records of ancestry. It's just another "blue ribbon" that everyone gets for participation. Those coddled little idiots pampered throughout school have grown up into precious little snowflakes that still need their ribbons.
31 posted on
06/26/2017 11:02:18 AM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: reaganaut1
So Roberts once again sided with the lunatic left on the court. Didn’t we used to hear how conservative he was/is?
To: reaganaut1
It is not right to name a man as a father to a child that is not his. Not unless he wants to adopt it. Otherwise the state and woman are treating him as an atm and forcing him into financial slavery for something he is not responsible for.
35 posted on
06/26/2017 11:43:36 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: reaganaut1
Did the homosexuals on the Court recuse themselves? < /sarc >
43 posted on
06/26/2017 1:25:54 PM PDT by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: reaganaut1
**The decision was unsigned. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., dissented. **
Where were the rest of the conservatives?
49 posted on
06/26/2017 2:45:54 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson