[reaganaut1]

A woman cannot be the biological father of a child, but according to legislators masquerading as justices, the state must pretend that she is.

[DiogenesLamp]

Gay Couples Entitled to Equal Treatment on Birth Certificates, Justices Rule

This is why we need to get Kennedy and the other liberal kooks off the court.

[blueplum]

What happens when the kid gets to be 12=18 and runs his DNA? Gays get divorced at a higher rate than straights. He’s going to find out the big lie. How’s it going to mess with his head, especially if, as most do, he grows up straight and the child wants to change his birth certificate to single mother parent, which he may not now be able to do now?

And what if a woman decides to be un-gay and decides to marry a man instead? That child is set up for having a gay influence ‘ex’ in his life for 18 years, compliments of a court who designated the ‘ex’ as ‘parent’. How’s that going to go over?

[so_real]

So now birth certificates have become meaningless and unhelpful records of ancestry. It's just another "blue ribbon" that everyone gets for participation. Those coddled little idiots pampered throughout school have grown up into precious little snowflakes that still need their ribbons.

[Uncle Sam 911]

So Roberts once again sided with the lunatic left on the court. Didn’t we used to hear how conservative he was/is?

[Secret Agent Man]

It is not right to name a man as a father to a child that is not his. Not unless he wants to adopt it. Otherwise the state and woman are treating him as an atm and forcing him into financial slavery for something he is not responsible for.

[JimRed]

Did the homosexuals on the Court recuse themselves? < /sarc >

[Salvation]

**The decision was unsigned. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., dissented. **

Where were the rest of the conservatives?