He was charged with a crime, he has the right to bail waiting trial.
He was charged with a crime, he has the right to bail waiting trial.
...
I think it’s a right to a bail hearing, not bail.
Armed robber who keeps attcking society, yep, catch and release until someone is killed. Poor judging skills if you ask me.
In this case it was the robber who is knocking on death’s door, with any luck the thug dies from complcations,
Considering his lengthy rap sheet, and the violent nature of his crimes, the judge could have denied bail or set it so high that no bondsman would have provided the bail money.
Repeat offenders and career criminals are often be held without bail.
Thank you for posting the voice of reason here. If the 'perp' were such a threat that he really needed to stay behind bars and the judge granted him bail, then I agree that the his face needs to be gotten into.