Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Souled_Out

California would say no. It may go all the way to the USSC, and they still would say no. Revealing the fraud would bring down their entire corrupt system. They’d fight that to their last breath.


9 posted on 06/29/2017 4:48:22 PM PDT by rightwingcrazy (rightwingcrazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingcrazy

You’re right.

It would easily show dual registrations, registrations by non-citizen, and voting by deceased.

They’ll never allow it. It’s like asking a man to bite his own nuts off.


20 posted on 06/29/2017 4:57:22 PM PDT by Bogey78O (So far so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rightwingcrazy

If it comes to that:

52 U.S. Code 20703.

Demand for records or papers by Attorney General or representative; statement of basis and purpose

Any record or paper required by section 20701 of this title to be retained and preserved shall, upon demand in writing by the Attorney General or his representative directed to the person having custody, possession, or control of such record or paper, be made available for inspection, reproduction, and copying at the principal office of such custodian by the Attorney General or his representative. This demand shall contain a statement of the basis and the purpose therefor.
(Pub. L. 86–449, title III, ;303, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 88.)

52 U.S. Code 20701.

Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of elections; deposit with custodian; penalty for violation

Every officer of election shall retain and preserve, for a period of twenty-two months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of election and except that, if a State or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply with this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
(Pub. L. 86–449, title III, 301, May 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 88.)


21 posted on 06/29/2017 4:58:38 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: rightwingcrazy
California would say no. It may go all the way to the USSC, and they still would say no.

I completely agree. My first thought when reading the headline. That said, Trump's justice dept should swoop in during the dead of night and seize the California DMV database. The illegal alien data motherlode.
55 posted on 06/29/2017 5:40:04 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson