Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz

I refuse to believe that at least part of the testimony cannot be public. Same with Podesta. Malodorous!


2 posted on 07/02/2017 6:25:58 AM PDT by t4texas (Remember the Alamo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: t4texas

She lies in public with no shame. Why allow it in private?


3 posted on 07/02/2017 6:27:03 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: t4texas

Fix is in. Too many involved have blackmail-ready files. Ain’t no one “working” in DC very long without being compromised.


6 posted on 07/02/2017 6:28:11 AM PDT by canalabamian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: t4texas

I don’t see anything except the headline that says it’s going to be private....”meet with committee” - means PRIVATE as opposed to a public hearing?


18 posted on 07/02/2017 6:40:01 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: t4texas; Liz; HarleyLady27

Why are these skunks (Rice and Podesta) allowed to float their testimony (lies) behind closed doors?

Phooey!


32 posted on 07/02/2017 7:10:19 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson