[olezip]

Local Muslims, meanwhile, worried that last week’s Supreme Court decision partly approving the 90-day travel ban for visitors from six mostly Muslim countries, and Trump’s restrictive refugee policies, will increase anti-Muslim sentiment in the country.

You would think that the affected people would want to look into what it will take to have their countries removed from the travel ban. What do they need to do to adequately vet immigrants? How can they help their country better vet their people?

How do countries not on the banned list work with the USA to vet their people?

What constitutes acceptable vetting? Many Muslim countries already have good vetting procedures.

Or, are they just Democrats playing the blame game?

Do they know why the Obama administration had a travel ban on their countries?

Do they know where anti-Muslim sentiment comes from? Do they think that the terrorist attacks by Muslims have something to do with that negative sentiment? Or not?

[editor-surveyor]

.
>> “Many Muslim countries already have good vetting procedures.” <<

Aww c’mon, thats like the DNC vetting the KKK!

How does one ‘vet’ himself?

Islam is the terror. All true followers of the Quran are global threats, because that is what the book demands.
.