Posted on 07/06/2017 11:09:00 AM PDT by Lorianne
Full title: North [CA] state residents take a page from minority activists playbook and push for better representation in state government. ___
o rural residents have a constitutional right to reasonable political representation, or is that reserved only for big-city residents? That question is at the heart of a recent lawsuit that although unquestionably a long shot could shake up Californias political map.
The issue garnered fair-minded coverage from the New York Times, which captured the gist of the problem in a spot-on headline: Californias Far North Deplores Tyranny of the Urban Majority. It covers an issue this writer has reported on for the Spectator: residents in the sparsely populated, yet geographically massive, north state have virtually no say over the regulations, taxes, and land-use policies that govern their lives.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Quarter the state
State of Jefferson ping.
>Quarter the state
Rather change it up to ‘voting tabulation on a county by county level’. Let the cities\pop centers continue to vote\rig all they want....won’t mean a hill of beans.
Isn’t that what the Constitution was all about? Protecting the minority from the majority??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.