Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rktman

Dates back to 2011, so not exactly new, perhaps improved. The Obama minions wouldn’t let them publish as government employees, so they released a paper under pseudonyms (names spelled in reverse), were called out on that basis—thus paper retracted. Links in chronological order.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/29/unified-theory-of-climate/

https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/unified_theory_of_climate_poster_nikolov_zeller.pdf

The paper as submitted/published (2014) before their ruse discovered:

https://springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2193-1801-3-723

Recent discussion:

https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2017/06/01/foundations-of-greenhouse-theory-challenged-by-new-analysis-of-solar-system-observations/

The most recent published paper:

https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/new-insights-on-the-physical-nature-of-the-atmospheric-greenhouse-effect-deduced-from-an-empirical-planetary-temperature-model.php?aid=88574


49 posted on 07/09/2017 1:49:09 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ozark Tom

***Eventually, their true identities were discovered, and so, the journal, Advances in Space Research, retracted the paper, though the editors acknowledged that the retraction was “not related to the scientific merit of the study.”***

So in essence, the editors are admitting that they retracted the paper due to political reasons, not scientific ones. I’m glad that they have at least come clean about the reason.


54 posted on 07/09/2017 4:32:58 PM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson