Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: laxcoach

I’m a technical ignorant, but this is very simple: if these files were downloaded remotely via a remote hack, the time stamp on the various files would have had more space between them due to slower speeds via the remote connection. Instead, the time stamps on these files shows they had to be downloaded via a local connection. There’s also some evidence it was to a USB, so that, too.

What bothers me is that this is news: this is entirely obvious and I would assume any FBI or other forensic analysis would have looked for this type of metadata immediately.


23 posted on 07/09/2017 3:24:05 PM PDT by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: nicollo

It really depends on how it was downloaded - what software. The create/modified dates can remain unchanged. Any software I have ever written or used keeps the timestamps intact.


27 posted on 07/09/2017 3:28:11 PM PDT by laxcoach (Government is greedy. Taxpayers who want their own money are not greedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: nicollo
I would assume any FBI or other forensic analysis would have looked for this type of metadata immediately.

The DNC wouldn't let the FBI examine their servers. The DNC used a private company called Crowdstrike, that they already employed, to examine their servers. Crowdstrike gave the FBI a report but never shared the actual data with them. The FBI was OK with that.

34 posted on 07/09/2017 3:34:46 PM PDT by TigersEye (Investigate the Awan brothers and Wasserman Schultz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson