Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months. What It Means For The Russia Narrative
dailycaller.com ^ | July 9, 2017 | by Rachel Stoltzfoos

Posted on 07/10/2017 12:34:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Jim Robinson
"The Media Perpetuated A Clinton Lie For 9 Months."

The "Big Lie."


41 posted on 07/10/2017 5:01:00 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clearcarbon

Bttt!


42 posted on 07/10/2017 5:13:50 PM PDT by Pagey (8 years of MISERY, Thanks to Valerie Jarrett. Wretched human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

43 posted on 07/10/2017 5:27:13 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eaglestar

44 posted on 07/10/2017 5:29:46 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: eaglestar

45 posted on 07/10/2017 5:32:13 PM PDT by eaglestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Number of law enforcement agencies who actually forensically examined the hacked servers - ZERO!!!!!


46 posted on 07/10/2017 5:57:46 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

And not Four agencies, but rather certain very specific political appointees at said agencies !

Who cares if the Russians had TV shows in 2012 (CIA report claim)

Who cares if the Russian TV shows talked bad about the US on occasion in 2012 (same CIA report)?

Who cares if Russian TV ‘aggressively’ used social media to promote their shows (like every other company on the planet !). Also in 2012 (same Dec CIA report.


47 posted on 07/10/2017 5:58:32 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: henkster

And not Four agencies, but rather certain very specific political appointees at said agencies !

Who cares if the Russians had TV shows in 2012 (CIA report claim)

Who cares if the Russian TV shows talked bad about the US on occasion in 2012 (same CIA report)?

Who cares if Russian TV ‘aggressively’ used social media to promote their shows (like every other company on the planet !). Also in 2012 (same Dec CIA report.


48 posted on 07/10/2017 6:03:42 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; henkster; DoughtyOne; SaveFerris; Grampa Dave; Cboldt; GOPJ; sickoflibs
This is a really important story, but there is a lot to read if you want to go deeper. I recommend these links:

New Research Shows Guccifer 2.0 Files Were Copied Locally, Not Hacked

There is some very deep tech stuff in this one but it contains a very useful timeline from June 2016 to April 2017

49 posted on 07/10/2017 9:04:13 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Why didn't the FBI examine DNC servers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I was sure that Coast Guard Intelligence was the 4th intelligence agency to agree that the Russians were meddling in our elections.

My bad!

If you detect a little sarcasm here, it is because it is.


50 posted on 07/10/2017 9:32:30 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

I think i said what you said re: the DNI, only shorter.

The “ICA 2017-01D | 6 January 2017” report was put out by the DNI.

It’s that report the specifically mentions which Intel agencies are involved.

You can read it and download it here:

https://lawfareblog.com/odni-releases-report-assessing-russian-activities-and-intentions-recent-us-elections

A couple of interesting things is: the best level they give is “high confidence”, which is defined by U.S. Intelligence as such:

“High confidence generally indicates judgments based on high-quality information from different sources.
High confidence in a judgment does not imply that the assessment is a fact or a certainty; such judgement might be wrong.

The sources from which they based the confidence levels are mostly TV\Magazines\Social Media - Facebook\Utube\Twitter.

My question is: How did Hillary Clinton “know” about the Intel Assessment at least as early as May 2016 when the DHS first made a public statement in Oct 2016?


51 posted on 07/10/2017 9:35:56 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

....” How did Hillary Clinton “know” about the Intel Assessment at least as early as May 2016 when the DHS first made a public statement in Oct 2016?”.......

Hillary and the Dems. have used this Russian Quest from day one....and why they set Trump Jr. up as they did..which is now in the news. They do not have any evidence rather from day one they determined to manufacture/organize and design the ‘evidence’ and expected , as we see, the MSM to carry it for them as they determined.

Hillary and Obama intend to take down this administration and will continue to manufacture false events, narratives and the like......this keeps THEM in the news and appeals to their base who are just as evil as they are!


52 posted on 07/10/2017 10:12:27 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
Duranty for NYT covered up Stalin's Gulags. Now they aren't even intellectual enough to spin a top rate ideological slam, just filth, gossip, sources say, no objectivity. I used to subscribe and read everyday but gave up long ago.
53 posted on 07/10/2017 11:01:00 PM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tillacum
Good point— Russia turned around and sold uranium to Iran who paid with the crates of US$$ Obama secretively flew to them! Obama and Clinton committed a treasonous act here. They may both have been operatives all along. This is what Trump alludes to in the fight for the West.
54 posted on 07/10/2017 11:14:32 PM PDT by The Westerner (Protect the most vulnerable: get the government out of medicine and education!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Russia turned around and sold uranium to Iran who paid with the crates of US$$ Obama secretively flew to them! Obama and Clinton committed a treasonous act here. They may both have been operatives all along. This is what Trump alludes to in the fight for the West.
55 posted on 07/11/2017 7:03:20 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (President Trump is not a Republican suffering from post traumatic press syndrome...!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Russia turned around and sold uranium to Iran who paid with the crates of US$$ Obama secretively flew to them! Obama and Clinton committed a treasonous act here. They may both have been operatives all along. This is what Trump alludes to in the fight for the West.
56 posted on 07/11/2017 7:03:30 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (President Trump is not a Republican suffering from post traumatic press syndrome...!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

The ‘deep state’ influenced the Presidential election on behalf of Hillary Clinton AND the ‘deep state’ is today actively working against President Trump.

The liberal elite Deep State has three primary enemies: Traditional Americans, Republicans AND Russians. Russians function as a scapegoat and rational for the massive funding the deep state demands of taxpayers - and as an excuse for the billions spent on ‘peeping tom intelligence services’.

The liberal elite Deep State has backers: EU Globalists, Democrats and Progressives.


57 posted on 07/11/2017 7:08:54 AM PDT by GOPJ ( MSM Snowflakes: if you don't like President Trump's tweets don't read 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider; All
call me a crazy conspiracy theory nut case, but I have a nagging feeling Comey knows who killed Seth Rich

ANYONE with an IQ much above room temperature can name the killer.

Who gained the most?

Who had the power to control the investigation?

Who has a history of having political and investigative opponents mysteriously and most conveniently die?

Who still has the power to put pressure on Shaun Hannity (and many others) for bringing up Seth Rich on his show?

There is ONE really perfect fit to all of the above questions and some lesser likely fits. ALL of them are connected to Podesta's emails. It is WHY Seth Rich had to be killed.

And it's not conspiracy theory, it is conspiracy fact!

58 posted on 07/11/2017 7:16:05 AM PDT by politicianslie (There are no MODERATE MUSLIMS.. ALL MUSLMS are commanded by KORAN to kill infidels. ALL MUST GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

59 posted on 07/11/2017 8:14:42 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All

60 posted on 07/11/2017 10:07:07 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson