Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ciaphas Cain

I don’t know what history books you have read but slavery was not on it’s way out. The southern slave owners precipitated a war to protect a perceived threat to their “property”. Slaves were being used in some of the factories in the south. Without the civil war slavery would probably have lasted well into the 20th century.


15 posted on 07/19/2017 5:09:59 PM PDT by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OIFVeteran; jmacusa
Left to their own devices, the South would have abandoned slavery in a decade. Yes, from a production perspective it was a can't-lose. But the Christian world was abandoning slavery fast and the southern states were really the last holdout. The social stigma of getting goods produced by slaves was losing appeal in England and other countries.

You can't have a thriving economy if nobody buys your product.

And many plantation owners were coming to realize that freed employees, allowed to work for you and also for their own families, tended to be more productive than people owned as property. Manumission became more common.

But the northern interests didn't want competition. And a consequence was that the South... which would have given up slavery sooner than later... instead hunkered down and said "SCREW YOU!"

Slavery could have ended by virtue of the free market. Instead the matter was forced at the point of a gun. Can't really blame anyone for responding in kind, if their homes and their families are threatened.

22 posted on 07/19/2017 6:17:05 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain (I don't give a damn about your feelings. Try to impress me with your convictions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson