It's a gravy train if you can get it....
Posted on 07/19/2017 8:10:20 PM PDT by Morgana
Shouldn’t he have recused himself?
Alas poor Orrick, we know thee(too well)
People whisper of the Illuminati and the Masons, but the open conspiracy is the Bar. Lawyers run everything of note in this country. They control the language used, the laws written, interpretation of the law and each citizens freedom or lack of depending on their obedience.
People whisper of the Illuminati and the Masons, but the open conspiracy is the Bar. Lawyers run everything of note in this country. They control the language used, the laws written, interpretation of the law and each citizens freedom or lack of depending on their obedience.
When are you seats going to learn; judges are god! Now shut and obey!
seats > serfs
Yep, not to mention they have hijacked haealthcare too and are responsible for 20% of the costs.
I would have told the judge to shove it up his ass in court.
Arizona sure can pick 'em. Red state? More like magenta or pink.
Wasn’t this the judge that has promised to release dirt on the the DNC and the Clintonistas ? < / sarcasm> (There.... , let HRC Cartel take care of him)
The judge issued it. If it’s wrong are they going to just defy or are they going to appeal? I hope it was worth the defiance. Not sure what a summary wouldn’t do to get public support for Daleiden’s defense that a defiance would. The problem is the ABORTIONS. Any after-use of the bodies is a minor fillip on that. Keeping focus on the ABORTIONS would be key here. IMHO
“Fear God: honor the king.”
Nowhere near all the other possible approaches have been used yet. The problem is hard hearted mothers being helped to be even more hard hearted by a flood of so called liberal lies. The sale of dead body parts is a small sideshow here. Should Daleiden have exposed this aggravating factor? Sure. Should pro-life have defied the court order while the very investigation that is supposed to determine if the expose is legit is in motion? Color me unsold here.
That’s a good question, but sometimes the law of the land crosses a point where compliance contradicts your core beliefs (e.g. Daniel 3; firey furnace).
The murder of innocent humans (abortion) shouldn’t be legal. And any marketplace regarding human parts should be exposed.
With Orrick’s obvious conflict of interest, and the egregious video evidence, it’d be difficult to sit on that. Plus who’s to say the court would’ve ruled in their favor in the end.
It’s a tough judgement call to make.
The judge exceeded his authority; there is no way the public didn’t have a right to know what Planned Parenthood was doing. The video was relevant evidence and should have been made available to the public. Moral right and wrong sometimes do take precedence over judges’ rulings.
I can’t think of a single instance where video taped undercover footage has ever had fines levied, or a judge telling the people trying to expose the truth that they were unable to speak or spread that truth. 60 minutes and every local news outlets have done this for years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.