Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/30/2017 5:01:04 AM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hojczyk

MOST Democrats should be in PRISON!


2 posted on 07/30/2017 5:04:19 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Get the rope


3 posted on 07/30/2017 5:08:18 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

So if anyone in the Obama administration asked the FBI to unmask the Trump campaign team, the FBI is powerless to deny that request? As UN Ambassador,Powers had NO business making those requests, and should have been told so.
It sounds as though the FBI was only too happy to spy on the Republican candidate’s team. Obviously there was collusion among Democrats in the Obama administration and the intel agencies, but what will the Republicans do about it? Now they have a dozen Democrats led by Mueller trying to find an impeachable offense to get rid of President Trump.


4 posted on 07/30/2017 5:23:47 AM PDT by txrefugee (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk; Ann Archy; moder_ator; Jim Robinson

The leading POST is NOT the linked article.

Come on please follow the rules.

There is a reason to lock-down this tread.


5 posted on 07/30/2017 5:24:10 AM PDT by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Just so long as no committee or prosecutor gives her immunity. Unmasking involved paperwork and requests, which should be easy enough to approve. The officials who received the requests, even if verbal, are likely employees, not political operatives, let them have immunity to testify that they received the requests and from whom. Then lit her explain that she got them, and if she did not leak them, who did she give them to. Further, was she asked to do the unmasking or did it on her own. Somewhere is email to prove perjury is she chooses to lie.

What I don't understand is that Trump has been in office for over 6 months and his administration has not coughed up details. Seems all he and his leadership need to do is tell their staff to release all info. Maybe Trump and company are simply milking this as a distraction to keep beating up on Dems?

7 posted on 07/30/2017 5:29:47 AM PDT by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp is not party specific. Lyn' Ted is still a liar, Good riddance to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Power needs to be flipped and granted immunity, she has young children and a very smart lawyer husband...she doesn’t want to go to prison...

Rice who will take one for Obama and the team...Brennan the psycho would prefer to take Bill Colby’s old kayak out on a one way paddle down the Potomac...

The illegal unmasking of Trump, his family, his campaign staff and business associates is the biggest political scandal nobody wants to talk about...


8 posted on 07/30/2017 5:30:41 AM PDT by Geronimo (God Bless America and President Donald J. Trump...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

If Samantha Power signed the requests she would have done so as the pawn of whomever was running the Democrat’s surveillance and destabilization ops (assuming she was not). Why would the UN Ambassador have ANY role in intel analysis? The UN Ambassador is a consumer of intel product, who gets instructions from the State Department on what US policy is. She was not an analyst who had any reason to see even the masked communications.

This smells like misdirection or a set up to blame a foreign national who can slip away.


10 posted on 07/30/2017 5:39:31 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Between Samantha and her husband, Cass Sunstein, you may be on to something.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein


11 posted on 07/30/2017 5:45:09 AM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Samantha Power wasn’t behind sh*t.

The candidates for “behind unmasking” are three: Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett, and John O. Brennan.

The candidates for “behind Barack Obama” are two: Valerie Jarrett and William Ayers.


16 posted on 07/30/2017 5:54:44 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Never Trust a Democrat.


19 posted on 07/30/2017 6:07:45 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

NAS & FISA: Yet another set of BIG govt approved and supported by the ‘Const. loving party of Lincoln’.

These should be a SLAM dunk of abuse of We the People, but the uniparty is DAMN quiet on the matter.

D.C. leadership? Party? Hell, even the (C)\(R) ‘think tanks’ are mute


20 posted on 07/30/2017 6:14:55 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

If true, why did Samantha let Susan Rice bear the brunt of her (Sam’s) own actions? What did Susan have to gain by acting as the Traveling Paid Liar Extrodinaire on Sunday talk shows? Making a fool of herself over and over. The payoff must have been grand!


25 posted on 07/30/2017 8:26:58 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

...then somebody at NSA/FBI approved them all....

“I was just following orders” is not a legal defense

Hang them high


27 posted on 07/30/2017 9:30:10 AM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson