Posted on 08/03/2017 3:47:34 AM PDT by servo1969
It is no news that some Republicans have opposed Trump all along and do not support him as President. Anyone with a pulse knows that their opposition is budding into an insurrection, and some even make the case for a full blown putsch, as does Hoover Fellow Richard Epstein in "Presidential Chaos."
Although, "the Republican case against Trump is in the whispering phase, as no one wants openly to state the obvious," Epstein does just that. He argues that because a self-inflicted "perpetual state of dysfunction and chaos" has claimed the Trump presidency, he instructs "cooler heads in the Republican party to have a heart-to-heart with a stubborn President Trump, to create the needed political momentum for him to leave office -- for the good of his party, and, most importantly, for the good of the nation."
Since there are no grounds for impeachment by either party, he suggests Trump be ousted by Republicans to prevent Democrats from controlling the narrative.
-------------------------
So there really aren't any substantive grounds for his overthrow. It really comes down to the individual, the way he governs, the way he acts, and the chaos that flows in his wake, which is damaging the party and the country. If these were legitimate grounds for a legitimate ouster, pretty much every President would be vulnerable
Why don't these self-righteous senators and provocateurs who think they are America's last best hope just stab the guy to death? It doesn't sound like they'll have a problem finding a Brutus. Et tu Jeff Flake, John McCain, Lindsay Graham?
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Business, that is international business engaged by American corporations large and small make the world go round.
Your constant whining will not make the world stop spinning.
Someone, please, ask the good professor how he plans to deal with the pitchfork wielding hordes outside his office window should his little plan bear fruit.
Will he attempt to rely upon the rule of law? The deplorables scoff.
Amen. If they want DJT’s endorsement, ALL incumbents should be required to publicly sign a pledge that says they will resign and agree to pay DJT a penalty fine, if they do not support their party’s president on ALL his agenda items.
"central_va...." How utterly predictable.
Why don't you change your screen name to something a little less indicative.
I guess you missed the whole point of Trump's election you fool. When the inevitable war starts with Asia(China) Free Traitors™ will be hanging from the light poles. Your day is coming.
Where is his prediction faulty? Explain?
You have glommed on to Trump thinking he is you.
Trump is not you. He proved in his early days he was not only probusiness but listened to learn what he could do to promote business and thus jobs and thus wealth.
Trump has no intention of following you to the dark ages.
Being plausible does not equal insightful.
Please refer to my request above for validations of his earlier predictions.
It is obvious that a large percentage of posters here belong to the old moneyed class of retired old farts. I got news for them, you can’t take it with you. St. Peters doesn’t look at your net worth.
Your an idiot in denial. You are also Free Traitor™ scum unworthy to be a US citizen. But you probably think the same of me.
Now THAT is a break in the cognitive chain that demands justification.....
Meaningful meaningful keyword meaningful....not just legislation for legislations sake. These are akin to Sessions chasing marijuana dealers vs the big stuff leaks and Hillary.
Sour grapes? Take take issue with me this is reality. Take it up with the RINO Congress and our President who should be on camera each day leading and push Congress for freedom driving legislation
My earlier predictions? Please do cite those I’m anxiously w
Chaos cooler heads
Isn’t this what was happening during the election
Cooler heads were going to get Trump to step down as head of the ticket
Same Crapolla
These ‘cooler heads’ need to be photoshopped onto pikes and memed.
Like +1,000,000
I will not say your prediction will come true but I cannot find anything wrong with your reasoning.
I don’t believe Trump would have any support for martial law. And I agree it’s needed. There are plenty who should be charged with treason. But no one to do the charging. He couldn not even get a n eeded wiretap executed on McCain.
Precisely my point.
Do you have previously successful predictions on which to predicate your analytical acumen?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.