So... SOLICITING for criminal activity
This is a prosecutable criminal conspiracy by it’s definition.
“Conspiracy. An agreement between two or more persons to engage jointly in an unlawful or criminal act.”
150 years ago, their building would be burned down around their ears.
Sec. Pruitt better never have spoken harshly to his dog, or Maxine “The Hideous” Waters will be crusading for his ouster. If you are actually eradicating the Socialist/Communist framework of the Obama reign, you have a neon target on your back.
It’s illegal to solicit other people breaking the law.
It is illegal to solicit a hit man. It is illegal to do what the times is doing.
Names???
If money or gifts were handed out, wouldn’t that be bribery?
ping
This is hysterical. Apparently someone “leaked” this LOL
The New York Times has the FOIA law at its disposal, a law which I am sure it encouraged be enacted for greater “transparency” in government. There is an FOIA office/desk/staff at EPA who handles FOIA requests. If there is any holdup in getting FOIA answers the requester is free to publish the fact of their request and that the agency it went to hasn’t answered it.
Pruiit should inform all EPA staff that all of that is in place at the EPA, and that is the route by which public requests for EPA information will can and will be addressed.
Pruiit should also inform all EPA staff that if they chose to act as internal spies on EPA activity and bypass the lawful FOIA route to public transparency, they need to do so as FORMER EPA employees, and if they don’t they will be.
Oh Great, another CRIME the DOJ can ignore.
Arrest them. Conspiracy to commit a felony.
Hmm sounds like Spying
isnt soliciting to commit a felony a crime in and of itself
exactly what use is JEFF SESSIONS....
i mean we have the clinton e-mail scandal.... nothing
clinton foundations scandal .... nothing
the awan/schultz spy ring scandal.... nothing
comey felonies.... mc cabe crimes .... mueller crimes.... NOTHING...
SEEMS sessions has a NO SHOW JOB.....
come on Jeff get off yor ass and get going
We have a shot at the AG cleaning house on leaks like this if he will use the RICO law. Clearly there is an admitted conspiracy between two or more people to obtain classified and other information for personal or corporate gain by publishing the material.
You will only have to use the RICO law once or twice for the leaks and the publishers of leaks to stop leaking classified information.