Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

A vacant lot there would be a bargain at $50/SF. Let the sellers and buyers hire separate appraisers, and split the difference. The sellers will still come out $millions to the good, and the homeowners will have no more tax bills. Everybody wins.


12 posted on 08/08/2017 1:24:58 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Romulus
Wouldn't there always be a tax bill as long as it's owned by someone other than the city?

This kind of thing must happen all the time in private developments with publicly-accessible private streets running through them.

16 posted on 08/08/2017 1:31:49 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Romulus

“The sellers will still come out $millions to the good, and the homeowners will have no more tax bills. Everybody wins.”

Not so, the problem here is that instead of the street being apportioned to each adjoining property so that each resident pays his share of the city and county of SF’s property taxes, evidently the street was a separate taxable property. It does blow me away that the property taxes were only $14 per year. Looks like they have had a “special deal” on taxes for many, many years. Here in our neighborhood in the East Bay we live on a private road (seven homes) and each of us pays property taxes on the roadway which is simply an easement on each lot. On our acre and a half lot with a good-size home, property taxes are around $20,000 per year.


41 posted on 08/08/2017 2:10:34 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson