Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Revolutionary

Exactly. So why would a judge take this case, instead of turning them away in the first place.


4 posted on 08/09/2017 11:07:33 AM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

In a sane World they would not. But we no longer live in a sane world. That ship sailed when the voters, in their infinite wisdom, returned the muslim to the White House by a majority vote. We now live in a Get President Trump World.


13 posted on 08/09/2017 11:21:43 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Exactly. So why would a judge take this case, instead of turning them away in the first place.

From Wikipedia:

The total number of Obama Article III judgeship nominees to be confirmed by the United States Senate is 329, including two justices to the Supreme Court of the United States, 55 judges to the United States Courts of Appeals, 268 judges to the United States district courts, and four judges to the United States Court of International Trade.

23 posted on 08/09/2017 11:34:53 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
"Exactly. So why would a judge take this case, instead of turning them away in the first place."

Mainly because these judges know that Congress will not do it's duty in removing badly behaved judges.

33 posted on 08/09/2017 12:05:41 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson