Stop contradicting the ‘climate scientist’....
Actual sciences are listed below.
Natural/Pure Sciences include the following:
Physics
Chemistry
Earth science
Ecology
Oceanography
Geology
Meteorology
Space Science or Astronomy
Life science
Biology
Zoology
Human biology
Botany
Formal sciences include the following:
Decision theory
Logic
Mathematics
Statistics
Systems theory
Theoretical computer science
Applied sciences include the following:
Engineering
Applied mathematics
Applied physics
Medicine
Computer science
NOTICE THE MISSING SCIENCE... Climate Science.
Just like anybody can call themselves an Astrologist, anybody can call themselves a Climate Scientist. The only difference... Astrologist take your money, then they tell you your the future. Climate Scientist tell you the future, then they take your money.
Notice the BIGGER missing 'science.'
Climate modeling...
Only Computer Science has “science” in its name. Unlike climate “science” real sciences don’t have to designate the selves as sciences.
Thank you for saying more completely w hat I have been saying for years that climate “chicken little’s” are not scientists because earth’s weather depends upon the sun and dynamic forces on earth itself. And these self described “scientists” work suffers from too small of a sample size as they ignore earlier climate cycles in earth’s history.
There is a category for “Climate Change”.
It should be listed under “Cargo Cult”