Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study What General Pershing Did To Terrorists When Caught
President Trump viaTwitter ^ | 08/17/17 | President Trump

Posted on 08/17/2017 4:58:47 PM PDT by Enlightened1

Study what General Pershing of the United States did to terrorists when caught. There was no more Radical Islamic Terror for 35 years!

-President Trump

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: generalpershing; islam; militaryhistory; pershing; radical; radicalislam; terrorist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: vannrox

>> the media will yell, cry, gnash their teeth, and call it a lie.

The minions employed by Disney, Comcast, Viacom, and now AT&T. Remember that when it’s time to renew your subscriptions.


41 posted on 08/17/2017 10:35:43 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Enlightened1

43 posted on 08/18/2017 6:38:00 AM PDT by zeugma (The Brownshirts have taken over American Universities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The people have spoken
On Thursday Trump upped Pershing’s effectiveness by 10 years, to 35. Problematically for him, the bullets-in-pigs-blood episode never happened.

Bullets in pig's blood maybe not, but in his own book Pershing talks about one officer who buried a Muslim insurgent with a pig and said it had become a practice in the army. That doesn't mean Pershing ordered it. It doesn't tell us how common a practice it was. It doesn't prove that it actually happened, but we do know that Pershing said it happened.

It's not something Pershing ordered. It's also not something he stopped (assuming he could have). But by Pershing's account, it's what the army was doing in the southern Philippines at the time.

The tweet didn't say just exactly what Pershing or somebody else did, but when I saw the story and was skeptical about the tweet, I went to Google Books to look up Pershing's memoir, and I found the story. It doesn't look like news sources did even the minimal research, but chose instead to focus on a story Trump told back during the campaign.

The pig's blood anecdote is a very silly story and hard to believe. How were the insurgents to know that bullets had been dipped in pig's blood? But if somebody says, "study what General Pershing did," why wouldn't you go to Pershing's own book on the subject to find out what he said was happening?

P.S. Snopes rated the "buried with a pig" story false, but also didn't look it up in Pershing's book. If Trump were a Democrat, they'd at least have called the story partially true.

44 posted on 08/19/2017 10:32:12 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson